IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v51y2021i2p772-787_16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Political Dynamics of Portfolio Design in European Democracies

Author

Listed:
  • Sieberer, Ulrich
  • Meyer, Thomas M.
  • Bäck, Hanna
  • Ceron, Andrea
  • Falcó-Gimeno, Albert
  • Guinaudeau, Isabelle
  • Hansen, Martin Ejnar
  • Kolltveit, Kristoffer
  • Louwerse, Tom
  • Müller, Wolfgang C.
  • Persson, Thomas

Abstract

The design of government portfolios – that is, the distribution of competencies among government ministries and office holders – has been largely ignored in the study of executive and coalition politics. This article argues that portfolio design is a substantively and theoretically relevant phenomenon that has major implications for the study of institutional design and coalition politics. The authors use comparative data on portfolio design reforms in nine Western European countries since the 1970s to demonstrate how the design of government portfolios changes over time. Specifically, they show that portfolios are changed frequently (on average about once a year) and that such shifts are more likely after changes in the prime ministership or the party composition of the government. These findings suggest a political logic behind these reforms based on the preferences and power of political parties and politicians. They have major implications for the study of institutional design and coalition politics.

Suggested Citation

  • Sieberer, Ulrich & Meyer, Thomas M. & Bäck, Hanna & Ceron, Andrea & Falcó-Gimeno, Albert & Guinaudeau, Isabelle & Hansen, Martin Ejnar & Kolltveit, Kristoffer & Louwerse, Tom & Müller, Wolfgang C. & P, 2021. "The Political Dynamics of Portfolio Design in European Democracies," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(2), pages 772-787, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:2:p:772-787_16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123419000346/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:51:y:2021:i:2:p:772-787_16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.