IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v50y2020i3p1111-1136_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Review Article: A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results and Missing Pieces

Author

Listed:
  • Åberg, Jenny
  • Sedelius, Thomas

Abstract

This study maps the general lines of semi-presidential research with regard to theory, topics and methods. It identifies research gaps and provides recommendations for future studies. The review includes a general screening of 327 publications covering the period 1970–2015, and a close reading of sixty-five selected publications. The findings suggest that the inconsistent use of regime type definitions has limited the possibilities for generalizations. The study tracks the influence of some seminal articles, as well as the recent trend of focusing on the role and powers of the president. The article calls for more studies beyond Europe, and suggests that the field would benefit from including Historical and Normative Institutionalism. Finally, it suggests the need for studies on public administration that are relevant to the functioning of semi-presidential government.

Suggested Citation

  • Åberg, Jenny & Sedelius, Thomas, 2020. "Review Article: A Structured Review of Semi-Presidential Studies: Debates, Results and Missing Pieces," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(3), pages 1111-1136, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:50:y:2020:i:3:p:1111-1136_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123418000017/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:50:y:2020:i:3:p:1111-1136_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.