IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v50y2020i1p1-15_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender, Incumbency and Party List Nominations

Author

Listed:
  • Meserve, Stephen A.
  • Pemstein, Daniel
  • Bernhard, William T.

Abstract

This study assesses how political parties’ candidate selection strategies influence women’s descriptive parliamentary representation. Focusing on proportional elections, it explores what determines whether parties place women in viable list positions. Evaluating party rankings at the individual level, it directly examines a mechanism – party nomination – central to prevailing explanations of empirical patterns in women’s representation. Moreover, it jointly evaluates how incumbency and gender affect nomination. This study uses European Parliament elections to compare a plethora of parties, operating under numerous institutions, in the context of a single legislature. It finds that gender differences in candidate selection are largely explained by incumbency bias, although party ideology and female labor force participation help explain which parties prioritize the placement of novice women.

Suggested Citation

  • Meserve, Stephen A. & Pemstein, Daniel & Bernhard, William T., 2020. "Gender, Incumbency and Party List Nominations," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 50(1), pages 1-15, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:50:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123417000436/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:50:y:2020:i:1:p:1-15_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.