IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v49y2019i04p1499-1526_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational and Ideological Strategies for Nationalization: Evidence from European Parties

Author

Listed:
  • Borz, Gabriela
  • de Miguel, Carolina

Abstract

How does a party’s organizational structure affect its chances of becoming a national party? While existing explanations of party nationalization focus on country-level institutional and societal variables, we argue that aspects of party organization such as the degree of centralization of authority, ideological unity and leadership factionalism also matter. By bringing the analysis to the party level, this article provides a multilevel analysis of institutional and party organization variables and disentangles the effect of each set of influences. We use original data on party organization and party nationalization for 142 parties across twenty European countries. This research contributes to the literature on nationalization and party development by advancing organizational strategies which parties could adopt in different social and institutional environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Borz, Gabriela & de Miguel, Carolina, 2019. "Organizational and Ideological Strategies for Nationalization: Evidence from European Parties," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 49(4), pages 1499-1526, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:49:y:2019:i:04:p:1499-1526_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S000712341700028X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mattia Zulianello, 2021. "The League of Matteo Salvini: Fostering and Exporting a Modern Mass-Party Grounded on “Phygital” Activism," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 228-239.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:49:y:2019:i:04:p:1499-1526_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.