IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v41y2011i03p581-597_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Freedom for All? The Strength and Limits of Political Tolerance

Author

Listed:
  • Petersen, Michael
  • Slothuus, Rune
  • Stubager, Rune
  • Togeby, Lise

Abstract

Most research on political tolerance relying on the ‘least-liked’ group approach has painted a bleak picture of low and feeble levels of tolerance. An alternative approach, permitting an evaluation of the breadth of tolerance, is combined with the use of survey experiments to demonstrate that tolerance varies considerably across target groups. Specifically, the formation of tolerance judgements is shown to differ depending on a group’s association with violent and non-democratic behaviour. Thus, tolerance is high and resilient towards groups that themselves observe democratic rights – even if these groups are disliked or feared. The theory suggests that this is caused by norms of reciprocity and, contrary to extant research, this article shows that within the limits set by these norms, tolerance is strong.

Suggested Citation

  • Petersen, Michael & Slothuus, Rune & Stubager, Rune & Togeby, Lise, 2011. "Freedom for All? The Strength and Limits of Political Tolerance," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(3), pages 581-597, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:41:y:2011:i:03:p:581-597_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123410000451/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cengiz Erisen & Cigdem Kentmen-Cin, 2017. "Tolerance and perceived threat toward Muslim immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands," European Union Politics, , vol. 18(1), pages 73-97, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:41:y:2011:i:03:p:581-597_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.