IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v32y2002i01p119-146_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When are Monetary Commitments Credible? Parallel Agreements and the Sustainability of Currency Unions

Author

Listed:
  • STASAVAGE, DAVID
  • GUILLAUME, DOMINIQUE

Abstract

This article investigates the conditions which make it costly for governments to renege on institutional commitments governing monetary policy. Focusing on one such type of commitment – monetary integration – we develop and test a hypothesis which suggests that the presence of parallel international agreements plays an important role in raising the costs of exit for states which might otherwise withdraw from a monetary union. While existing political economy work on credible commitments in the area of monetary policy has had a heavy focus on countries in the European Union, we broaden the inquiry, using quantitative and qualitative evidence from the numerous African countries which have participated in monetary unions over the last forty years. Our results provide strong support for the parallel agreements hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Stasavage, David & Guillaume, Dominique, 2002. "When are Monetary Commitments Credible? Parallel Agreements and the Sustainability of Currency Unions," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 119-146, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:32:y:2002:i:01:p:119-146_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123402000054/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:32:y:2002:i:01:p:119-146_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.