IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v24y1994i03p319-357_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Electoral Bias: Australia, 1949–93

Author

Listed:
  • Jackman, Simon

Abstract

Electoral systems translate citizens' votes into seats in the legislature, and are thus critical components of democracies. But electoral systems can be unfair, insulating incumbents from adverse electoral trends, or biasing the mapping of votes to seats in favour of one party. I assess methods for measuring bias and responsiveness in electoral systems, highlighting the limitations of the popular ‘multi-year’ and ‘uniform swing’ methods. I advocate an approach that incorporates constituency-level and jurisdiction-wide variation in party's vote shares. I show how this method can be used to elaborate both the extent and consequences of malapportionment. I then present election-by-election estimates of partisan bias and responsiveness for ninety-three state and federal elections in Australia since 1949. The empirical results reported show that the coalition parties have generally ‘out-biased’ the Australian Labor party, despite some notable pro-ALP biases. The overall extent of partisan bias in Australian electoral systems, however, has generally diminished in magnitude over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackman, Simon, 1994. "Measuring Electoral Bias: Australia, 1949–93," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 319-357, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:24:y:1994:i:03:p:319-357_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123400006888/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tanima Chatterjee & Bhaskar DasGupta & Laura Palmieri & Zainab Al-Qurashi & Anastasios Sidiropoulos, 2020. "On theoretical and empirical algorithmic analysis of the efficiency gap measure in partisan gerrymandering," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 512-546, August.
    2. Tanima Chatterjee & Bhaskar DasGupta & Laura Palmieri & Zainab Al-Qurashi & Anastasios Sidiropoulos, 0. "On theoretical and empirical algorithmic analysis of the efficiency gap measure in partisan gerrymandering," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-35.
    3. Munzert, Simon, 2017. "Forecasting elections at the constituency level: A correction–combination procedure," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 467-481.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:24:y:1994:i:03:p:319-357_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.