IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/bjposi/v19y1989i04p445-463_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘God Hath Ordained to Man a Helper’: Hobbes, Patriarchy and Conjugal Right

Author

Listed:
  • Pateman, Carole

Abstract

There are two conflicting and equally misleading interpretations of Hobbes: either he is a patri-archalist like Filmer – but the premise of Hobbes's theory is that political right originates in maternal not paternal lordship; or he is an anti-patriarchalist – but he endorses the subjection of wives to husbands in civil society. To appreciate how Hobbes turns mother right into a specifically modern, non-paternal form of patriarchy, an understanding is required of his peculiar view of the family as a protective association of master and servants that originates in conquest (contract). Secondly, a conjectural history of the defeat of women by men in the natural condition and their incorporation into ‘families’ has to be provided. The overthrow of mother right enables men to enter the original contract, to create Leviathan in their own image, and to secure the fruits of their conquest by establishing patriarchal political right, exercised in large part as conjugal right.

Suggested Citation

  • Pateman, Carole, 1989. "‘God Hath Ordained to Man a Helper’: Hobbes, Patriarchy and Conjugal Right," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(4), pages 445-463, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:19:y:1989:i:04:p:445-463_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007123400005585/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cristiana Roxana NEACȘU, 2018. "“Manly†Presences in Modernity: Social Contract Theory," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Tomita CIULEI & Gabriel GORGHIU (ed.), CATES 2017, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 20, pages 201-210, Editura Lumen.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:bjposi:v:19:y:1989:i:04:p:445-463_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.