IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v45y2015i01p127-150_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

SOME ADVANCES ON THE ERLANG(n) DUAL RISK MODEL

Author

Listed:
  • Rodríguez-Martínez, Eugenio V.
  • Cardoso, Rui M. R.
  • Egídio dos Reis, Alfredo D.

Abstract

The dual risk model assumes that the surplus of a company decreases at a constant rate over time and grows by means of upward jumps, which occur at random times and sizes. It is said to have applications to companies with economical activities involved in research and development. This model is dual to the well-known Cramér-Lundberg risk model with applications to insurance. Most existing results on the study of the dual model assume that the random waiting times between consecutive gains follow an exponential distribution, as in the classical Cramér-Lundberg risk model. We generalize to other compound renewal risk models where such waiting times are Erlang(n) distributed. Using the roots of the fundamental and the generalized Lundberg's equations, we get expressions for the ruin probability and the Laplace transform of the time of ruin for an arbitrary single gain distribution. Furthermore, we compute expected discounted dividends, as well as higher moments, when the individual common gains follow a Phase-Type, PH(m), distribution. We also perform illustrations working some examples for some particular gain distributions and obtain numerical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodríguez-Martínez, Eugenio V. & Cardoso, Rui M. R. & Egídio dos Reis, Alfredo D., 2015. "SOME ADVANCES ON THE ERLANG(n) DUAL RISK MODEL," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(1), pages 127-150, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:45:y:2015:i:01:p:127-150_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036114000191/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Krishnamurthy, Rashmi & Awazu, Yukika, 2016. "Liberating data for public value: The case of Data.gov," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 668-672.
    2. Han, Dongsu & Baek, Sanghoon, 2017. "Status of renewable capacity for electricity generation and future prospects in Korea: Global trends and domestic strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1524-1533.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:45:y:2015:i:01:p:127-150_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.