IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v44y2014i03p587-612_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Posteriori Ratemaking With Panel Data

Author

Listed:
  • Boucher, Jean-Philippe
  • Inoussa, Rofick

Abstract

Ratemaking is one of the most important tasks of non-life actuaries. Usually, the ratemaking process is done in two steps. In the first step, a priori ratemaking, an a priori premium is computed based on the characteristics of the insureds. In the second step, called the a posteriori ratemaking, the past claims experience of each insured is considered to the a priori premium and set the final net premium. In practice, for automobile insurance, this correction is usually done with bonus-malus systems, or variations on them, which offer many advantages. In recent years, insurers have accumulated longitudinal information on their policyholders, and actuaries can now use many years of informations for a single insured. For this kind of data, called panel or longitudinal data, we propose an alternative to the two-step ratemaking approach and argue this old approach should no longer be used. As opposed to a posteriori models of cross-section data, the models proposed in this paper generate premiums based on empirical results rather than inductive probability. We propose a new way to deal with bonus-malus systems when panel data are available. Using car insurance data, a numerical illustration using at-fault and non-at-fault claims of a Canadian insurance company is included to support this discussion. Even if we apply the model for car insurance, as long as another line of business uses past claim experience to set the premiums, we maintain that a similar approach to the model proposed should be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Boucher, Jean-Philippe & Inoussa, Rofick, 2014. "A Posteriori Ratemaking With Panel Data," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(3), pages 587-612, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:44:y:2014:i:03:p:587-612_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036114000117/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bolancé, Catalina & Vernic, Raluca, 2019. "Multivariate count data generalized linear models: Three approaches based on the Sarmanov distribution," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 89-103.
    2. Mihaela COVRIG & Dumitru BADEA, 2017. "Some Generalized Linear Models for the Estimation of the Mean Frequency of Claims in Motor Insurance," ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, Faculty of Economic Cybernetics, Statistics and Informatics, vol. 51(4), pages 91-107.
    3. Catalina Bolancé & Raluca Vernic, 2017. "“Multivariate count data generalized linear models: Three approaches based on the Sarmanov distribution”," IREA Working Papers 201718, University of Barcelona, Research Institute of Applied Economics, revised Oct 2017.
    4. Gning, Lucien & Diagne, M.L. & Tchuenche, J.M., 2023. "Hierarchical generalized linear models, correlation and a posteriori ratemaking," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 614(C).
    5. Lee, Woojoo & Kim, Jeonghwan & Ahn, Jae Youn, 2020. "The Poisson random effect model for experience ratemaking: Limitations and alternative solutions," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 26-36.
    6. Bermúdez, Lluís & Guillén, Montserrat & Karlis, Dimitris, 2018. "Allowing for time and cross dependence assumptions between claim counts in ratemaking models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 161-169.
    7. Alicja Wolny-Dominiak & Tomasz Żądło, 2021. "The Measures of Accuracy of Claim Frequency Credibility Predictor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    8. Pechon, Florian & Denuit, Michel & Trufin, Julien, 2019. "Home and Motor insurance joined at a household level using multivariate credibility," LIDAM Discussion Papers ISBA 2019013, Université catholique de Louvain, Institute of Statistics, Biostatistics and Actuarial Sciences (ISBA).
    9. Verschuren, Robert Matthijs, 2022. "Frequency-severity experience rating based on latent Markovian risk profiles," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 379-392.
    10. Mihaela Covrig & Iulian Mircea & Gheorghita Zbaganu & Alexandru Coser & Alexandru Tindeche, 2015. "Using R In Generalized Linear Models," Romanian Statistical Review, Romanian Statistical Review, vol. 63(3), pages 33-45, September.
    11. Abdallah, Anas & Boucher, Jean-Philippe & Cossette, Hélène, 2016. "Sarmanov family of multivariate distributions for bivariate dynamic claim counts model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 120-133.
    12. Key Pousttchi & Alexander Gleiss, 2019. "Surrounded by middlemen - how multi-sided platforms change the insurance industry," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 609-629, December.
    13. Tan, Chong It, 2016. "Varying transition rules in bonus–malus systems: From rules specification to determination of optimal relativities," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 134-140.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:44:y:2014:i:03:p:587-612_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.