IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v99y2005i03p463-466_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace

Author

Listed:
  • DOYLE, MICHAEL W.

Abstract

Sebastian Rosato (2003) finds the logic of the “democratic peace†flawed in his “The Flawed Logic of Democratic Peace Theory,†and he cites my work and other studies as examples of the flawed logic. Some of the logic he describes is flawed, and it may characterize some of the literature in the wide field of “democratic peace,†but it is not the logic underlying the core of liberal peace theory. Indeed, the persuasive core of the logic underlying the theory of liberal democratic peace is missing from Rosato's account. Republican representation, an ideological commitment to fundamental human rights, and transnational interdependence are the three pillars of the explanation. The logic underlying the peace among liberal states rests on a simple and straightforward proposition that connects those three causal mechanisms as they operate together and only together, and not separately as Sebastian Rosato claims.

Suggested Citation

  • Doyle, Michael W., 2005. "Three Pillars of the Liberal Peace," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 99(3), pages 463-466, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:99:y:2005:i:03:p:463-466_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055405051798/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Harrison & Nikolaus Wolf, 2014. "The Frequency of Wars," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: THE ECONOMICS OF COERCION AND CONFLICT, chapter 5, pages 121-149, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Seung-Whan Choi, 2010. "Beyond Kantian Liberalism," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 27(3), pages 272-295, July.
    3. Destradi, Sandra, 2010. "A Regional Power Promoting Democracy? India's Involvement in Nepal (2005-2008)," GIGA Working Papers 138, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    4. Edward Demenchonok, 2007. "1 From a State of War to Perpetual Peace," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(1), pages 25-47, January.
    5. Maxim Bratersky & Gunes Gokmen & Andrej Krickovic, 2016. "It’S Not the Economy Stupid! Is Russia-Us Trade Really Underdeveloped? A Test Using Gravity Models," HSE Working papers WP BRP 26/IR/2016, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    6. Gearoid Millar, 2021. "Ambition and ambivalence: Reconsidering positive peace as a trans-scalar peace system," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 58(4), pages 640-654, July.
    7. Manfred Elsig & Karolina Milewicz & Nikolas Stürchler, 2011. "Who is in love with multilateralism? Treaty commitment in the post-Cold War era," European Union Politics, , vol. 12(4), pages 529-550, December.
    8. Navarrete Guzmán, T., 2019. "Transitional justice in Colombia: competing discourses in a peace agreement context," ISS Working Papers - General Series 645, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    9. Magnus Lundgren, 2016. "Conflict management capabilities of peace-brokering international organizations, 1945–2010: A new dataset," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 33(2), pages 198-223, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:99:y:2005:i:03:p:463-466_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.