IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v93y1999i01p153-168_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists

Author

Listed:
  • Brady, Henry E.
  • Schlozman, Kay Lehman
  • Verba, Sidney

Abstract

A survey of the American public is used to model citizen political recruitment as a two-stage process. First, those who recruit others to become active in politics seek likely activists through “rational prospecting.†Second, they seek acquiescence to their requests. We model each part of the process, delineating the characteristics of individuals that make them attractive prospects and that make them likely to say “yes.†Recruiters who have information about, and leverage over, their targets are more likely to be successful. In seeking out people who would be likely not only to participate but also to participate effectively, rational prospectors select people with characteristics that are already overrepresented among participants. The net result of the recruitment process for political activity in general—and for financial contributions, in particular—is to exacerbate participatory stratification.

Suggested Citation

  • Brady, Henry E. & Schlozman, Kay Lehman & Verba, Sidney, 1999. "Prospecting for Participants: Rational Expectations and the Recruitment of Political Activists," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 93(1), pages 153-168, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:93:y:1999:i:01:p:153-168_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400216687/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Per Strömblad & Gunnar Myrberg, 2013. "Urban Inequality and Political Recruitment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(5), pages 1049-1065, April.
    2. Caroline Guibet Lafaye & Pierre Brochard, 2022. "Methodological approach to the evolution of a terrorist organisation: ETA, 1959–2018," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(4), pages 2453-2475, August.
    3. Sidney Verba & Kay L. Schlozman & Henry E. Brady, 2000. "Rational Action and Political Activity," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 12(3), pages 243-268, July.
    4. Jennifer Oser & Jan E. Leighley & Kenneth M. Winneg, 2014. "Participation, Online and Otherwise: What's the Difference for Policy Preferences?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(5), pages 1259-1277, December.
    5. Franz Hackl & Martin Halla & Gerald J. Pruckner, 2007. "Volunteering and Income – The Fallacy of the Good Samaritan?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 77-104, February.
    6. Traag, V.A. & Quax, R. & Sloot, P.M.A., 2017. "Modelling the distance impedance of protest attendance," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 171-182.
    7. S. A. Dhenge & S. N. Ghadge & M. C. Ahire & S. D. Gorantiwar & M. G. Shinde, 2022. "Gender attitude towards environmental protection: a comparative survey during COVID-19 lockdown situation," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13841-13886, December.
    8. Greg Vonnahme, 2014. "A preferential attachment model of campaign contributions in state legislative elections," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 235-249, April.
    9. Johnston Birchall & Richard Simmons, 2004. "What Motivates Members to Participate in Co‐operative and Mutual Businesses?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 465-495, September.
    10. Vincent A Traag, 2016. "Complex Contagion of Campaign Donations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, April.
    11. John E. Mcnulty, 2005. "Phone-Based GOTV—What’s on the Line? Field Experiments with Varied Partisan Components, 2002-2003," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 601(1), pages 41-65, September.
    12. J. Ryan Lamare, 2016. "Labor Unions and Political Mobilization: Diminishing Returns of Repetitious Contact," Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 346-374, April.
    13. Casey A. Klofstad & Benjamin G. Bishin, 2014. "Do Social Ties Encourage Immigrant Voters to Participate in Other Campaign Activities?," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 95(2), pages 295-310, June.
    14. Boguslawa Sardinha & Cesaltina Pacheco Pires, 2011. "To volunteer or not to volunteer? A cross-country study of volunteering," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2011_16, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).
    15. Henry E. Brady & Kay Lehman Schlozman & Sidney Verba, 2015. "Political Mobility and Political Reproduction from Generation to Generation," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 657(1), pages 149-173, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:93:y:1999:i:01:p:153-168_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.