IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v63y1969i04p1051-1061_26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The New Revolution in Political Science

Author

Listed:
  • Easton, David

Abstract

A new revolution is under way in American political science. The last revolution—behavioralism—has scarcely been completed before it has been overtaken by the increasing social and political crises of our time. The weight of these crises is being felt within our discipline in the form of a new conflict in the throes of which we now find ourselves. This new and latest challenge is directed against a developing behavioral orthodoxy. This challenge I shall call the post-behavioral revolution.The initial impulse of this revolution is just being felt. Its battle cries are relevance and action. Its objects of criticism are the disciplines, the professions, and the universities. It is still too young to be described definitively. Yet we cannot treat it as a passing phenomenon, as a kind of accident of history that will somehow fade away and leave us very much as we were before. Rather it appears to be a specific and important episode in the history of our discipline, if not in all of the social sciences. It behooves us to examine this revolution closely for its possible place in the continuing evolution of political science. Does it represent a threat to the discipline, one that will divert us from our long history in the search for reliable understanding of politics? Or is it just one more change that will enhance our capacity to find such knowledge?

Suggested Citation

  • Easton, David, 1969. "The New Revolution in Political Science," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(4), pages 1051-1061, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:63:y:1969:i:04:p:1051-1061_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400263193/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lloyd I. Rudolph & Susanne Hoeber Rudolph, 2013. "Rajni Kothari’s Career in Political Science," Studies in Indian Politics, , vol. 1(1), pages 1-5, June.
    2. Mun Hee Kang, 2000. "A Review on the Methodological Arguments in the Study of Comparative Politics," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 3(2), pages 141-177, June.
    3. Daniel J. Kriek, 1995. "David Easton and the Analysis of Political Structure," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 7(1), pages 29-39, January.
    4. George Kent, 1971. "Discussion and Reviews : The application of peace studies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(1), pages 47-53, March.
    5. Ponce, Aldo F., 2004. "The Behavioralist Empire and its Enemies: a Comparative Study of Successes and Dissatisfactions in American Political Science," MPRA Paper 35376, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Drasospolino, & Zauhar, Soesilo & Santoso, Bambang & Hermawan,, 2023. "The Forest Management Policy and its Influence in Forest area Utilization and Empowering Forest Communities in Yogyakarta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    7. Fontaine, Philippe & Pooley, Jefferson, 2020. "Introduction: Whose Social Problems?," SocArXiv w59f3, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:63:y:1969:i:04:p:1051-1061_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.