IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v117y2023i4p1379-1394_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Participation, Development, and Accountability: A Survey Experiment on Democratic Decision-Making in Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • TOUCHTON, MICHAEL
  • WAMPLER, BRIAN

Abstract

Many governments in semi-democratic regimes have adopted participatory democratic institutions to promote development and accountability. But limited resources, weak civil society, and a history of authoritarian politics make building subnational democratic institutions daunting. Do participatory institutions expand accountability in these environments? We address this question by evaluating citizen decision-making in Kenya’s local participatory processes. We first administered a survey experiment surrounding citizens’ development policy preferences to 9,928 respondents in four Kenyan counties. We then nest this survey experiment in participant observation and over 80 elite interviews. Our conclusions are mixed: respondents readily change their policy preferences to align with the government’s policy actions, which suggests limited prospects for accountability. However, respondents use participatory budgeting venues to question government officials about missing projects, which provides a potential foundation for accountability. Yet, uncompetitive local elections, the absence of independent civil society’s participation, and new program rules are likely to limit democratic accountability.

Suggested Citation

  • Touchton, Michael & Wampler, Brian, 2023. "Participation, Development, and Accountability: A Survey Experiment on Democratic Decision-Making in Kenya," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 117(4), pages 1379-1394, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:4:p:1379-1394_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055422001484/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:117:y:2023:i:4:p:1379-1394_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.