IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v54y2025i2p552-581_9.html

Militarization, industrial progress, and their carbon footprints in North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries: a panel econometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Riaz, Mahmud Hasan
  • Khan, Musa
  • Ahmed, Zobayer
  • Zobair, Shah Asadullah Mohd

Abstract

This study uniquely explores the impact of militarization on carbon emissions in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) countries from 1985 to 2019 using panel econometric techniques. NATO countries, characterized by substantial defense budgets, advanced technologies, high industrialization, and significant energy consumption, offer a unique context for examining these factors. Employing the Pooled Mean Group Autoregressive Distributed Lag (PMG-ARDL) and FMOLS models, the research analyzes the long-term and short-term dynamics across three groups: traditional NATO members (Group 1), new NATO members (Group 2), and a combined group (Group 3). Relevant variables used in the estimation are industrialization, technological innovation, energy consumption, and economic growth. Findings reveal that in Group 1, military expenditure and energy consumption significantly increase carbon emissions, while industrialization and technological innovation reduce them. In Group 2, increased military spending and industrialization reduce emissions, but energy consumption and technological innovation increase them. For Group 3, economic growth significantly drives emissions, whereas industrial advancements and selective technological innovations mitigate them. The study underscores the need for tailored environmental policies and technological advancements to reduce carbon emissions, contributing to sustainable development within military alliances. These insights are crucial for policymakers aiming to balance defense needs with environmental sustainability in NATO countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Riaz, Mahmud Hasan & Khan, Musa & Ahmed, Zobayer & Zobair, Shah Asadullah Mohd, 2025. "Militarization, industrial progress, and their carbon footprints in North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries: a panel econometric analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(2), pages 552-581, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:552-581_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280525100087/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:54:y:2025:i:2:p:552-581_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.