IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v54y2025i1p220-242_11.html

Measuring the value of water quality improvements for recreation use on an urban river: a travel cost contingent behavior approach

Author

Listed:
  • Chakrabartty, Joy Deep
  • Parsons, George R

Abstract

We estimate the value of water quality improvements for recreational activities on and near the Brandywine Creek in Delaware. We divide water-based recreational activities into two groups: water-contact and non-water-contact. We then consider the behavioral change of the recreationists in each group when faced with water quality improvements posed in a stated preference (contingent behavior) survey. We use five common physical attributes of water quality in the contingent behavior analysis: water clarity, catch rate of fish, safety of eating fish, safety for swimming, and ecological health. The survey was constructed in such a way that each of these attributes of water quality is valued. The per-trip value for water quality improvements ranged from $4 to $63 for contact use and from $4 to $29 for non-contact use depending on which and how many attributes of water quality improve. Even though we measure sizable benefits, rough cost estimates appear to make it difficult for incremental improvements to exceed costs unless attribute improvement is widespread.

Suggested Citation

  • Chakrabartty, Joy Deep & Parsons, George R, 2025. "Measuring the value of water quality improvements for recreation use on an urban river: a travel cost contingent behavior approach," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 54(1), pages 220-242, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:54:y:2025:i:1:p:220-242_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280524000091/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:54:y:2025:i:1:p:220-242_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.