IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v52y2023i3p623-653_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contaminated water and the Food Safety Modernization Act

Author

Listed:
  • Bahalou Horeh, Marziyeh
  • Elbakidze, Levan
  • Taylor, R. Garth

Abstract

We develop a theoretical framework and present a corresponding empirical analysis of the Food and Drug Administration’s irrigation water quality regulatory standard under the Food Safety Modernization Act using lettuce as a case study. We develop a stochastic price endogenous partial equilibrium model with recourse to examine the standard’s efficacy under various scenarios of foodborne illness severity, standard implementation, demand response to foodborne outbreaks, and irrigation costs. The stringency of regulation is evaluated with endogenous producer response to regulatory requirements and corresponding implications for economic surplus. The baseline results show that in the case of the lettuce market, the proposed microbial irrigation water quality regulation in the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) is not cost effective relative to the existing Leafy-Greens Marketing Agreements relying on water treatment for mitigation of microbial contamination. However, FSMA can be cost effective if water treatment is sufficiently expensive.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahalou Horeh, Marziyeh & Elbakidze, Levan & Taylor, R. Garth, 2023. "Contaminated water and the Food Safety Modernization Act," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(3), pages 623-653, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:52:y:2023:i:3:p:623-653_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280523000229/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:52:y:2023:i:3:p:623-653_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.