IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v46y2017i03p555-578_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dairy Productivity and Technical Change: An Analysis of Confinement and Management Intensive Grazing Dairies in Maryland for 1995–2009

Author

Listed:
  • Minegishi, Kota
  • Johnson, Dale M.

Abstract

U.S. dairy production has been consolidating into large-scale confinement operations. Large numbers of small- to medium-scale dairies have disappeared in the last two decades, and many more are disappearing. This article analyzes small- to medium-scale dairy operations in Maryland during 1995–2009 for changes in technology and efficiency through a novel two-stage DEA approach to examine productivity changes. Conventional confinement dairy operations and management-intensive grazing dairies are analyzed separately. The results show that both dairy systems have become more productive on the technological frontiers, yet the rate of technical change for graziers was less than half the rate for confinement.

Suggested Citation

  • Minegishi, Kota & Johnson, Dale M., 2017. "Dairy Productivity and Technical Change: An Analysis of Confinement and Management Intensive Grazing Dairies in Maryland for 1995–2009," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(3), pages 555-578, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:46:y:2017:i:03:p:555-578_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1068280517000041/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:46:y:2017:i:03:p:555-578_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.