IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/agrerw/v45y2016i02p338-366_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Endowment Effects and Drinking Water Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Booth, Pamela L.
  • Guilfoos, Todd
  • Uchida, Emi

Abstract

We conduct a laboratory experiment to test for the existence of the endowment effect—a gap between willingness to accept and willingness to pay—for improved drinking water quality using a within-subject design. We find a statistically significant and positive gap. Willingness to accept is 62 to 125 cents higher than willingness to pay on average, indicating the presence of endowment effects. This gap is robust to information about the quality of water being consumed. We also identify some heterogeneity in the size of the gaps that is associated with differences in subjects' knowledge of drinking water quality and disparities in their incomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Booth, Pamela L. & Guilfoos, Todd & Uchida, Emi, 2016. "Endowment Effects and Drinking Water Quality," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 45(2), pages 338-366, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:45:y:2016:i:02:p:338-366_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2372261416000230/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:agrerw:v:45:y:2016:i:02:p:338-366_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/age .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.