IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuf/journl/y2025v26i2n5zou.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mean Field Games and Global Arms Races: Strategic Dynamics in a Multipolar World

Author

Listed:
  • Heng-Fu Zou

    (IAS, Wuhan University
    CEMA, Central University of Finance and Economics
    The World Bank)

Abstract

This paper develops a dynamic game-theoretic framework to model global arms races in a multipolar world using mean field game (MFG) theory. We analyze the strategic behavior of a continuum of minor countries influenced by the military decisions of three major powers - the United States, China, and Russia - who engage in a finite-player differential game. Each country chooses its military expenditure over time to minimize a cost function that re flects internal costs and strategic positioning relative to others. We derive both general nonlinear and linear-quadratic-Gaussian(LQG) formulations, solve the coupled HJB-FPK systems, and simulate both time-dependent and stationary equilibria. Our results show how strategic interdependence, peer pressure, and deterrence incentives drive excessive militarization in decentralized equilib- rium. We compare decentralized and centralized outcomes and analyze policy interventions such as caps and taxes. The framework offers a rigorous foun dation for understanding military competition and evaluating arms control policies under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Heng-Fu Zou, 2025. "Mean Field Games and Global Arms Races: Strategic Dynamics in a Multipolar World," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 26(2), pages 615-642, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2025:v:26:i:2:n:5:zou
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://down.aefweb.net/AefArticles/aef260205Zou.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C73 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Stochastic and Dynamic Games; Evolutionary Games
    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • F51 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - International Conflicts; Negotiations; Sanctions
    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuf:journl:y:2025:v:26:i:2:n:5:zou. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Qiang Gao (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emcufcn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.