IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cud/journ2/v3y2025i7p43-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The virtual panopticon and the banalization of social risks: Qualitative evidence about algorithmic decision-making in Belgian municipalities

Author

Listed:
  • Truman Venters

    (University of St Andrews, St Andrews. UK.)

  • Sébastien Brunet

    (Department of Political Science, University of Liège, Liège. Belgium.)

  • Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo

    (Department of Economic Structure and Development Economics, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid. Spain.)

Abstract

The development of algorithms and data in Belgium has received some attention in recent years, but philosophical considerations have been left aside from the discussion. This work aims to fill this gap by investigating how public reason can interact with algorithms in Belgium. The approach is twofold. First, we develop a theoretical framework to construct the concept of public reason, which is expected to be aligned with the current stage and development of technology. Second, we test this framework using data from public administration at subnational level for three Belgian local authorities, Liège (Wallonia), Namur (Wallonia), and Antwerp (Flanders). By means of a qualitative approach based on interviews, we find how algorithms and data reduce men into simplified singularities and then provoke a “banalization” of public reason. This banalization of public reason leads to a banalization of local social risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Truman Venters & Sébastien Brunet & Ernesto Rodríguez-Crespo, 2025. "The virtual panopticon and the banalization of social risks: Qualitative evidence about algorithmic decision-making in Belgian municipalities," Revista de Economía y Finanzas (REyF), Asociación Cuadernos de Economía, vol. 3(7), pages 43-58, Enero.
    • Handle: RePEc:cud:journ2:v:3:y:2025:i:7:p:43-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://reveyf.es/index.php/REyF/article/view/387/188
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q33 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation - - - Resource Booms (Dutch Disease)
    • R1 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cud:journ2:v:3:y:2025:i:7:p:43-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Erick Tinsson (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.