IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cuc/eforum/v15y2025i3p97-111.html

Integration of behavioural insights into a general theory of health economic policy

Author

Listed:
  • Serhiy Inozemtsev

Abstract

The study aimed to conceptualise the role of behavioural economics mechanisms as a component of the modern theory of economic policy in the healthcare sector. The paper used the methods of modelling the cause-and-effect chain “tool – mechanism – behaviour – change – clinical outcomes – economic effect”, content analysis of international research materials, abstraction of the system of indicators (behavioural, clinical, economic), systematic analysis of performance indicators (Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio and return on investment, budgetary impact analysis). The findings demonstrated that structured reminders, scheduling prompts, social norms, and comparative feedback to providers reduced delayed visits, increased adherence, and reduced unnecessary procedures, which translated into lower intensity of costly episodes of care, more consistent quality of care, and reduced indirect productivity losses. The macroeconomic and fiscal implications of integrating behavioural insights into the general theory of economic policy were identified, including improved public health, which affected life expectancy and morbidity. Also, it was increased attendance and productivity, impact on the macroeconomy, which meant higher output, employment growth, as well as increased tax revenues, and lower disability benefits. A roadmap for implementation was proposed, which combined ethical principles of using behavioural tools, requirements for data infrastructure and mechanisms for regular monitoring (“planning – collection – analysis – feedback – correction”), allocating funding on results (key performance indicators: prevention coverage, proportion of healthy population, frequency of over-prescribing). The practical value was determined by an economically sound basis for reallocating resources towards preventive healthcare, increasing cost-effectiveness of expenditures and strengthening long-term fiscal sustainability through the channels of attendance, productivity and employment

Suggested Citation

  • Serhiy Inozemtsev, 2025. "Integration of behavioural insights into a general theory of health economic policy," E-Forum Working Papers, Economic Forum, vol. 15(3), pages 97-111, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:97-111
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.97
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://e-forum.com.ua/web/uploads/pdf/EF_15_3_2025_97-111.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.62763/ef/3.2025.97?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katya Tentori & Stefania Pighin & Giulia Giovanazzi & Andrea Grignolio & Benjamin Timberlake & Antonio Ferro, 2022. "Nudging COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake by Changing the Default: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 42(6), pages 837-841, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Ridder, Denise & Adriaanse, Marieke & van Gestel, Laurens & Wachner, Jonas, 2023. "How does nudging the COVID-19 vaccine play out in people who are in doubt about vaccination?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuc:eforum:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:97-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Economic Forum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://e-forum.com.ua/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.