IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cub/journm/v17y2022i4p2-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insight into biases when measuring socioeconomics and demographics of consumers patronizing retailing fashion design entrepreneurs: Germany’s perspective vs. South African requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Boitumelo Pooe

    (Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa)

  • Thomas Dobbelstein

    (Durban University of Technology, Durban, South Africa)

Abstract

With an increasingly globalised market, it has become more pivotal to provide cross-cultural analytics of the different markets conducting international business. Thus, this paper aims to study demographic and socioeconomic variables inherent when conducting a cross-cultural analysis of consumer needs when patronising retailing fashion design entrepreneurs in Germany and South Africa. The primary problem was identified when the research team tried to match German and South African demographics and socioeconomic variables. A discrepancy in variables was recognised, delaying an appropriate cross-cultural analysis. Currently, fashion design entrepreneurs are becoming increasingly interested in the global market. Consequently, this research intends to provide information about consumer differences between one of the Southern African economies and one of the central European economies. Hence, this paper recognises that it does not need to compare „apples with apples” but instead acknowledges that cross-cultural analytics are still possible in different societies if similarities are not forced but rather acknowledged and appropriately managed. As a result, the diverse demographic and socioeconomic variables identified when conducting a cross-cultural analysis between German and South African consumers patronising fashion design entrepreneurs were scrutinised, and necessary recommendations were provided. Accordingly, the main question interrogated in this paper is that of demographic and socioeconomic differences between Germany and South Africa. Secondly, the question related to how bias can be avoided when comparing demographic and socioeconomic variables between Germany and South Africa is studied. Finally, the question connected to German consumers' characteristics and levels of patronage towards retailing fashion design entrepreneurs was addressed. The empirical data was collected through quantitative measures, through a survey and from 469 respondents in Germany. The findings indicated that construct, method and item biases all needed to be carefully considered for a cross-cultural analysis between Germany and South Africa. Secondly, the results revealed that the profile of consumers patronising retailing fashion design entrepreneurs in Germany as highly educated millennial females with an upper-middle-income living in metropolitan areas with no children. Finally, it was found that just over 10% of the population patronised retailing fashion design entrepreneurs in Germany.

Suggested Citation

  • Boitumelo Pooe & Thomas Dobbelstein, 2022. "Insight into biases when measuring socioeconomics and demographics of consumers patronizing retailing fashion design entrepreneurs: Germany’s perspective vs. South African requirements," Marketing Science & Inspirations, Comenius University in Bratislava, Faculty of Management, vol. 17(4), pages 2-13.
  • Handle: RePEc:cub:journm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:2-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://msijournal.com/insight-biases-fashion-design-germany-south-africa/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    biases; cross-cultural; retailing; fashion designers; entrepreneurship; Germany; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cub:journm:v:17:y:2022:i:4:p:2-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Frantisek Olsavsky (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkomsk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.