IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v64y2016i1p65-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: The Case Against Boutique Tax Credits and Similar Tax Expenditures

Author

Listed:
  • Neil Brooks

    (Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, Toronto)

Abstract

One of the distinguishing features of the Harper Conservatives' tax policy was the enactment of a series of so-called boutique tax credits. Although the Canadian income tax was riddled with tax expenditures before the election of the Conservatives in 2006, a number of reasons can be identified that explain the Harper government's particular fondness for boutique tax credits. In addition to reviewing these explanations, this article defends three claims. First, boutique tax credits, along with almost all other tax expenditures, impair the legitimacy of the tax system and hobble it in the pursuit of its primary functions--raising revenue and redistributing income. Second, analyzed as spending programs, which they are, tax expenditures, particularly boutique tax credits, violate almost every criterion of a well-designed spending program. Third, the enactment of tax expenditures circumvents almost all of the accountability and control mechanisms of sensible budgetary policy making and thus imperils democratic governance for the common good. The article suggests that all tax expenditures should be subjected to analysis by a commission of public policy experts, to rationalize the spending done through the tax system. This process would increase the integrity of the Canadian tax system, the efficiency and equity of government spending programs, and the transparency and vibrancy of Canadian democracy, and would spell the end of the unprincipled use of boutique tax credits.

Suggested Citation

  • Neil Brooks, 2016. "Policy Forum: The Case Against Boutique Tax Credits and Similar Tax Expenditures," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 64(1), pages 65-133.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:65-133
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2016CTJ1.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William B. P. Robson & Alexandre Laurin, 2017. "Hidden Spending: The Fiscal Impact of Federal Tax Concessions," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 469, February.
    2. Chapman, Larry & McKenzie, Ken & Porter, Shawn & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2017. "Tax Policy Forum: Review of Tax Expenditures, Budget 2016," MPRA Paper 96926, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:64:y:2016:i:1:p:65-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.