IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ctf/journl/v63y2015i3p691-704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Policy Forum: Mountains and Molehills--Effects of the Small Business Deduction

Author

Listed:
  • Ted Mallett

    (Canadian Federation of Independent Business, Toronto)

Abstract

Active debate continues on the rationale and effectiveness of government policy on the corporate tax treatment of small businesses in Canada, where lower effective rates have been in place since 1949. Those arguing against a preferential rate for small businesses cite concerns about the sheltering of high personal incomes, business growth disincentives, and general lags in national productivity growth. These arguments, however, tend to assume that problems with tax policy at the margins can be generalized to all small businesses. Although preferential treatment is not a perfect approach to supporting entrepreneurship, any induced distortions caused by lower small business tax rates are relatively minor when placed in the context of the broader goals of offsetting financing barriers and compensating for high regulatory compliance costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Ted Mallett, 2015. "Policy Forum: Mountains and Molehills--Effects of the Small Business Deduction," Canadian Tax Journal, Canadian Tax Foundation, vol. 63(3), pages 691-704.
  • Handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:63:y:2015:i:3:p:691-704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ctf.ca/EN/Publications/CTJ_Contents/2015CTJ3.aspx
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chapman, Larry & McKenzie, Ken & Porter, Shawn & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2017. "Tax Policy Forum: Review of Tax Expenditures, Budget 2016," MPRA Paper 96926, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctf:journl:v:63:y:2015:i:3:p:691-704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jim Lyons (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ctf.ca/EN .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.