IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v50y2024i1p127-148.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evidence of the Challenge in Engaging Unemployed Youth with Online Learning Platforms

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Dhuey
  • Jill Furzer
  • Michal Perlman
  • Linda White

Abstract

Exposure to online learning platforms such as LinkedIn Learning, Coursera, and edX has been increasing, yet sustaining user engagement remains a significant barrier. We tested whether email reminders would increase engagement with LinkedIn Learning for unemployed youth not in school or training. All participants received without charge a license only (Group A), a license plus personalized onboarding (Group B), or a license plus personalized onboarding embedded in an intensive training program (Group C). In these three groups, participants were randomly assigned to either the treatment arm, who received reminder emails, or the control arm. A two-stage randomization design was implemented to account for potential peer spillover effects in the third group. We found no evidence of an effect of the email reminders on LinkedIn Learning use on aggregate. However, in the third group, which included ongoing training, high activation, and significant student interaction, we found some evidence of higher overall usage enhanced by spillover effects. These findings suggest that engagement with online learning tools may be enhanced with hands-on training, combined with online and in-person engagement and coaching on the use of online learning interfaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Dhuey & Jill Furzer & Michal Perlman & Linda White, 2024. "Evidence of the Challenge in Engaging Unemployed Youth with Online Learning Platforms," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 50(1), pages 127-148, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:50:y:2024:i:1:p:127-148
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2022-023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2022-023
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2022-023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:50:y:2024:i:1:p:127-148. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.