IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v44y2018i4p423-437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Can "Self-Financing" Redeem the Basic Income Guarantee? Disincentives, Efficiency Cost, Tax Burdens, and Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Rhys Kesselman

Abstract

Recent proposals have been advanced for "self-financing" a basic income guarantee (BIG). This article critically assesses claims that this method of finance would alleviate the economic issues of incentives and efficiency and the political issues of taxpayer burdens and support that challenge all major BIG schemes. The self-financing methods are shown merely to obscure the adverse impacts on marginal effective tax rates that would otherwise require explicit increases in income tax rates. Increased efficiency costs are shown by examples to be extremely large. The self-financing structure is also found to concentrate burdens on middle-income taxpayers. Public opinion surveys further suggest scant public support for the taxes that would be needed to finance such schemes. The article reviews the economic basis for categorical treatment, with BIG benefits focused on those who are unable to work and policies supporting work, earnings, and human capital investment for employable persons. This approach could be financed with lesser taxpayer burdens while according more closely with public values about work; it would also directly address the long-run causes of poverty rather than just the symptoms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Rhys Kesselman, 2018. "Can "Self-Financing" Redeem the Basic Income Guarantee? Disincentives, Efficiency Cost, Tax Burdens, and Attitudes," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 44(4), pages 423-437, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:423-437
    DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2017-064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2017-064
    Download Restriction: access restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3138/cpp.2017-064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tedds, Lindsay M. & Crisan, I. Daria, 2020. "Evaluating the Existing Basic Income Simulation Literature," MPRA Paper 105915, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Green, David & Kesselman, Jonathan Rhys & Tedds, Lindsay M., 2021. "Covering All the Basics: Reforms for a More Just Society," MPRA Paper 105902, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:44:y:2018:i:4:p:423-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.