IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v21y1995is1p77-99.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Canadian Experience with the Taxation of Capital Gains

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen R. Richardson
  • Kathryn E. Moore

Abstract

The Canadian experience with the taxation of capital gains reflects the tension between two fundamentally different ways of viewing capital gains; the first based on the classic delineation of capital as a source of income and the second based upon a definition of income that attempts to be comprehensive. This paper reviews the history of capital gains taxation in Canada, from the early United Kingdom cases, through the Carter Commission and tax reform, to the lifetime capital gains exemption. This review of the Canadian experience suggests that income taxation based on extreme versions of either the classical concept or the comprehensive tax base is ultimately unacceptable or impractical or both.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen R. Richardson & Kathryn E. Moore, 1995. "Canadian Experience with the Taxation of Capital Gains," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 21(s1), pages 77-99, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:21:y:1995:i:s1:p:77-99
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28199510%2921%3CS77%3ACEWTTO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-M
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adam M. Lavecchia & Alisa Tazhitdinova, 2021. "Permanent and Transitory Responses to Capital Gains Taxes: Evidence from a Lifetime Exemption in Canada," NBER Working Papers 28514, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:21:y:1995:i:s1:p:77-99. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.