IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v16y1990i1p60-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Economic Analysis of Canadian Content Regulations and a New Proposal

Author

Listed:
  • M. S. Shedd
  • E. A. Wilman
  • R. D. Burch

Abstract

This paper investigates the possible goals which the Canadian government might be pursuing through its Canadian content regulations. A number of policy tools, including the present regulations, are evaluated with respect to their potential for achieving these goals. In addition, a new and more efficient policy tool, transferable quotas, is considered.

Suggested Citation

  • M. S. Shedd & E. A. Wilman & R. D. Burch, 1990. "An Economic Analysis of Canadian Content Regulations and a New Proposal," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 16(1), pages 60-72, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:16:y:1990:i:1:p:60-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28199003%2916%3A1%3C60%3AAEAOCC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-D
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. G. Hoskins & Stuart McFadyen, 1982. "Market Structure and Television Programming Performance in Canada and the U.K.: A Comparative Study," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 8(3), pages 347-357, Summer.
    2. Jonah Goldstein, 1982. "Communication, Property Rights, and Broadcasting Vouchers," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 8(1), pages 45-56, Winter.
    3. Anthony E. Boardman & Aidan R. Vining, 1984. "Canadian and British TV Markets: Why the CBC Should Not Be Like the BBC [Market Structure and Television Programming Performance in Canada and the U.K.]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 10(3), pages 347-352, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lawson A.W. Hunter & Kenneth G. Engelhart & Peter Miller, 2017. "Strengthening Canadian Television Content: Creation, Discovery and Export in a Digital World," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 498, December.
    2. C. Leigh Anderson, 1992. "Canadian Content Laws and Programming Diversity," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 18(2), pages 166-175, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. C. Leigh Anderson, 1992. "Canadian Content Laws and Programming Diversity," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 18(2), pages 166-175, June.
    2. Chris Podmore, 1984. "Broadcasting Vouchers Rejected [Communication, Property Rights, and Broadcasting Vouchers]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 10(4), pages 472-473, December.
    3. C. Leigh Anderson & Gene Swimmer & Wing Suen, 1997. "An empirical analysis of viewer demand for U.S. programming and the effect of Canadian broadcasting regulations," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(4), pages 525-540.
    4. Anthony E. Boardman & Aidan R. Vining, 1984. "Canadian and British TV Markets: Why the CBC Should Not Be Like the BBC [Market Structure and Television Programming Performance in Canada and the U.K.]," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 10(3), pages 347-352, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:16:y:1990:i:1:p:60-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.