IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v15y1989i3p265-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Military-Industrial Complex in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Lynne M. Pepall
  • Daniel M. Shapiro

Abstract

This paper has two objectives. The first is to provide new evidence about Canadian firms which receive military contracts, and thus to define the extent and nature of the military-industrial complex (MIC) in Canada. The second is to examine some aspects of the public policy issues related to the MIC. The evidence indicates that the Canadian MIC mirrors the structure of Canadian industry in general to a large extent. It is highly concentrated, export-oriented and has significant degrees of foreign control. The authors' results also suggest that domestic military procurement may have been used to promote non-military objectives, particularly regional equality, but not in a consistent way.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynne M. Pepall & Daniel M. Shapiro, 1989. "The Military-Industrial Complex in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 15(3), pages 265-284, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:15:y:1989:i:3:p:265-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28198909%2915%3A3%3C265%3ATMCIC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-7
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ron Smith & Jacques Fontanel, 1987. "Weapons Procurement: Domestic Production versus Imports," Post-Print hal-02961554, HAL.
    2. Walter Adams & James W. Brock, 1987. "Corporate Size and the Bailout Factor," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 61-85, March.
    3. Christian Marfels*, 1978. "The Structure Of The Military‐Industrial Complex In The United States And Its Impact On Industrial Concentration," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 409-423, August.
    4. Marfels, Christian, 1978. "The Structure of the Military-Industrial Complex in the United States and Its Impact on Industrial Concentration," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 409-423.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Poole, Erik, 1990. "Le Québec militaire. Les dessous de l’industrie militaire québécoise, YVES BÉLANGER et PIERRE FOURNIER, Collection : « Paix », Montréal, Québec/Amérique, 1989, 203 p," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 66(2), pages 268-271, juin.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ron Smith & Jacques Fontanel, 1990. "The UK Defence Sector," Post-Print hal-02977609, HAL.
    2. Jean-Paul Hébert & Jacques Fontanel, 1991. "Economic Impact of Dual-Use Industries in France," Working Papers hal-03227080, HAL.
    3. Jacques Fontanel, 1989. "French arms industry. The procurement Process," Post-Print hal-03155566, HAL.
    4. Michael Ward & Jacques Fontanel, 1991. "Arms exports and growth in France," Post-Print hal-03542885, HAL.
    5. Jacques Fontanel, 1989. "The main characteristics of French arms industry," Post-Print hal-03163402, HAL.
    6. Jean-Paul Hébert & Jacques Fontanel, 1991. "Defence-related industrial sectors," Working Papers hal-03255476, HAL.
    7. E J Malecki, 1984. "Military Spending and the US Defense Industry: Regional Patterns of Military Contracts and Subcontracts," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 2(1), pages 31-44, March.
    8. Jacques Fontanel, 2004. "L'Etat, la sécurité nationale et le secteur militaire Le cas d'un désarmement," Post-Print hal-02869516, HAL.
    9. Jacques Fontanel, 1989. "The French arms industry and its present problems," Post-Print hal-02798903, HAL.
    10. Jacques Fontanel & Louis Pilandon, 1989. "An empirical analysis of French Arms exports. What consequences of the crisis," Post-Print hal-02947366, HAL.
    11. Jacques Fontanel & Jean-Paul Hébert, 1991. "French public defence expenditure and procurement policy," Working Papers hal-03207447, HAL.
    12. Löffler, Gunter & Posch, Peter N, 2013. "Wall Street’s bailout bet: Market reactions to house price releases in the presence of bailout expectations," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5147-5158.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:15:y:1989:i:3:p:265-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.