IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpo/journl/y2008i54p27-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The theory of bounded reflexivity. A contribution to the debate between the Economics of Conventions and the Regulation Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Franck BESSIS

Abstract

This article develops an action theory which explains the dynamics of rules. This theory emphasises two kinds of limitation. First, agents can only recognize the constructed dimension of rules under specific conditions. Second, agents question their beliefs without ever completely freeing themselves from these beliefs. This answer provides the framework to a general action theory potentially common to the Economics of Conventions and to the Regulation Theory. This theory deals with the orders of worth as well as balances of power. It reconciles rationally planned action with spontaneous adjustments as two moments of the same reversible process of rules' construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Franck BESSIS, 2008. "The theory of bounded reflexivity. A contribution to the debate between the Economics of Conventions and the Regulation Theory," Cahiers d’économie politique / Papers in Political Economy, L'Harmattan, issue 54, pages 27-56, Jan - Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2008:i:54:p:27-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cairn.info/acheter_article.php?ID_ARTICLE=CEP_054_0027
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • B52 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - Current Heterodox Approaches - - - Historical; Institutional; Evolutionary; Modern Monetary Theory;
    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpo:journl:y:2008:i:54:p:27-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Carlos Andrés Vasco Correa (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.cahiersdecopo.fr/fr/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.