IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i1p156-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Urban Planning by Experiment: Practices, Outcomes, and Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Scholl

    (Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, The Netherlands)

  • Joop de Kraker

    (Maastricht Sustainability Institute, Maastricht University, The Netherlands / Department of Environmental Sciences, Open Universiteit, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The impact of urban experimentation on urban planning approaches is so far insufficiently assessed and discussed. This thematic issue sets out to investigate the possibilities and limitations of ‘urban planning by experiment,’ defined as an approach that uses experimentation to innovate and improve urban planning instruments, approaches, and outcomes. It brings together eight contributions presenting original research on urban experimentation and its relation to urban planning. All contributions are empirically grounded in (illustrative) case studies, mostly from European cities. Here, we summarize and discuss the major findings across the eight contributions with respect to three key themes: the practices of urban experimentation, its outcomes, and its impacts on urban planning. We conclude that the practices of urban experimentation described in the contributions generated a wide variety of substantive and learning outcomes, which, according to the authors, represent worthwhile additions or alternatives to the current repertoire of approaches and instruments of urban planning. However, except for a single case, large-scale integration of experimentation in established approaches to urban planning was not observed, let alone a complete transformation of urban planning practices. An area for further research concerns the relation between the way urban experiments are organized and conducted, and their impact on urban planning.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment: Practices, Outcomes, and Impacts," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 156-160.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:156-160
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4248
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthias Wanner & Boris Bachmann & Timo von Wirth, 2021. "Contextualising Urban Experimentation: Analysing the Utopiastadt Campus Case with the Theory of Strategic Action Fields," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 235-248.
    2. Christian Scholl & René Kemp, 2016. "City Labs as Vehicles for Innovation in Urban Planning Processes," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 89-102.
    3. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    4. Lina Berglund-Snodgrass & Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren, 2020. "Conceptualizing Testbed Planning: Urban Planning in the Intersection between Experimental and Public Sector Logics," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 96-106.
    5. Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "The Practice of Urban Experimentation in Dutch City Labs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 161-170.
    6. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    7. Erica Eneqvist & Andrew Karvonen, 2021. "Experimental Governance and Urban Planning Futures: Five Strategic Functions for Municipalities in Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 183-194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lennert Verhulst & Corneel Casier & Frank Witlox, 2023. "Street Experiments and COVID‐19: Challenges, Responses and Systemic Change," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 114(1), pages 43-57, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Darren Sharp & Rob Raven, 2021. "Urban Planning by Experiment at Precinct Scale: Embracing Complexity, Ambiguity, and Multiplicity," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 195-207.
    2. Fredrik Envall, 2023. "Situated dynamics of environmental governance in Swedish smart energy experimentation: Tentativeness, demonstration, upscaling," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(5), pages 922-940, August.
    3. Ramon Marrades & Philippa Collin & Michelle Catanzaro & Eveline Mussi, 2021. "Planning from Failure: Transforming a Waterfront through Experimentation in a Placemaking Living Lab," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 221-234.
    4. Sandra Huning & Christiane Droste & Katrin Gliemann, 2021. "Promoting Interculture in Participation in German Urban Planning: Fields of Action for Institutional Change," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(2), pages 127-138.
    5. Erica Eneqvist & Andrew Karvonen, 2021. "Experimental Governance and Urban Planning Futures: Five Strategic Functions for Municipalities in Local Innovation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 183-194.
    6. Ozge CELIK YILMAZ & Ozhan ERTEKIN, 2023. "Urban Living Labs As A Tool To Achieve Sustainable Development Goal 16: A Case Study Of Istanbul, Turkiye," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 18(3), pages 88-118, August.
    7. Erick Elysio Reis Amorim & Monique Menezes & Karoline Vitória Gonçalves Fernandes, 2022. "Urban Living Labs and Critical Infrastructure Resilience: A Global Match?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Lennert Verhulst & Corneel Casier & Frank Witlox, 2023. "Street Experiments and COVID‐19: Challenges, Responses and Systemic Change," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 114(1), pages 43-57, February.
    9. Candel, Melissa & Paulsson, Jenny, 2023. "Enhancing public value with co-creation in public land development: The role of municipalities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Ulrik Kohl & John Andersen, 2022. "Copenhagen’s Struggle to Become the World’s First Carbon Neutral Capital: How Corporatist Power Beats Sustainability," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 230-241.
    11. Ivetheyamel Morales & Jordi Segalás & Torsten Masseck, 2023. "Urban Living Labs: A Higher Education Approach to Teaching and Learning about Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    12. Emma Puerari & Jotte I. J. C. De Koning & Timo Von Wirth & Philip M. Karré & Ingrid J. Mulder & Derk A. Loorbach, 2018. "Co-Creation Dynamics in Urban Living Labs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    13. Andrew Karvonen & Matthew Cook & Håvard Haarstad, 2020. "Urban Planning and the Smart City: Projects, Practices and Politics," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 65-68.
    14. Christian Scholl & Joop de Kraker, 2021. "The Practice of Urban Experimentation in Dutch City Labs," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(1), pages 161-170.
    15. Igor Calzada, 2018. "(Smart) Citizens from Data Providers to Decision-Makers? The Case Study of Barcelona," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Hugo Guyader & Brenda Nansubuga & Karin Skill, 2021. "Institutional Logics at Play in a Mobility-as-a-Service Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Nguyen, Huong Thu & Marques, Pilar & Benneworth, Paul, 2022. "Living labs: Challenging and changing the smart city power relations?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    18. Harry den Hartog, 2021. "Shanghai’s Regenerated Industrial Waterfronts: Urban Lab for Sustainability Transitions?," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 181-196.
    19. Sabrina Rahmawan‐Huizenga & Dara Ivanova, 2022. "THE URBAN LAB: Imaginative Work in the City," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 542-557, July.
    20. Jannes J. Willems & Astrid Molenveld & William Voorberg & Geert Brinkman, 2020. "Diverging Ambitions and Instruments for Citizen Participation across Different Stages in Green Infrastructure Projects," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 22-32.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:156-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.