IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v5y2017i3p7-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Feeling the Scope of Solidarity: The Role of Emotions for Volunteers Supporting Refugees in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Serhat Karakayali

    (Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Humboldt University Berlin, Germany)

Abstract

In recent political debates in Germany, volunteers and citizens who support the cause of refugees are often accused of being “too emotional”. Based mainly on empirical evidence from 10 group discussions and 35 individual interviews with volunteers, conducted in 2016, this article undertakes a sociological analysis of the role of emotions for volunteers.

Suggested Citation

  • Serhat Karakayali, 2017. "Feeling the Scope of Solidarity: The Role of Emotions for Volunteers Supporting Refugees in Germany," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 7-16.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:7-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/1008
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maureen Whitebrook, 2002. "Compassion as a Political Virtue," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 50(3), pages 529-544, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eva Youkhana & Ove Sutter, 2017. "Perspectives on the European Border Regime: Mobilization, Contestation and the Role of Civil Society," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 1-6.
    2. Stefan Wallaschek, 2019. "The Discursive Appeal to Solidarity and Partisan Journalism in Europe’s Migration Crisis," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(2), pages 187-197.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:7-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.