IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/socinc/v10y2022i3p149-159.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Barriers to Motherhood: Female STEM PhD Students’ Changing Family Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Veronika Paksi

    (Institute for Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary / Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Szeged, Hungary)

  • Beáta Nagy

    (Corvinus University of Budapest, Hungary)

  • Katalin Tardos

    (Institute for Sociology, Centre for Social Sciences, Hungary / International Business School, Hungary)

Abstract

Despite recent pronatalist policies in Hungary, the country has not boosted birth rates at the expected rate. Higher educated women still delay the transition to first birth, a smaller proportion of planned children are born than in Western European countries, and the level of childlessness has also been increasing. As a post‐socialist legacy, prevailing traditional family and gender norms strongly constrain the reconciliation of work and family roles, which can prevent women from realizing their childbearing intentions or drive them to live a childfree life. Qualitative studies about how the fertility decisions of women are formed are scarce, particularly in relation to male‐dominated high‐skilled professions, where the realization of family plans can be especially challenging. The present article explores the barriers to motherhood among female engineers. Results of 27 semi‐structured interviews with mainly childless female PhD students in 2014–2015 show that the women were subject to strong social expectations that negatively influenced their fertility plans. On the family side, these involve becoming a mother and being responsible for child care and household chores; on the work side, challenges include the knowledge‐intensiveness of jobs and a male career model that hardly tolerates the role of motherhood. As a result, the respondents had further delayed childbearing, forecast reconsidering family plans after first childbirth, and in one case, opted for voluntary childlessness. Women also reflected on how their fertility is at stake due to their postponed motherhood and the cumulative effects of hazardous laboratory work. Several intervention points are suggested to stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronika Paksi & Beáta Nagy & Katalin Tardos, 2022. "Perceptions of Barriers to Motherhood: Female STEM PhD Students’ Changing Family Plans," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 149-159.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:149-159
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5250
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theocharis Kromydas, 2020. "Educational Attainment and Gender Differences in Work–Life Balance for Couples across Europe: A Contextual Perspective," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 8-22.
    2. Beth Turnbull & Melissa L Graham & Ann R Taket, 2016. "Social Exclusion of Australian Childless Women in Their Reproductive Years," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 102-115.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Afzal, Ayesha & Hasnaoui, Jamila & Noor, Ramsha & Banerjee, Arindam, 2023. "Is saving the non-renewable resources worthwhile? Evidence of paradox of plenty on human capital development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Travers, Max & Liu, Edgar & Cook, Peta & Osborne, Caroline & Jacobs, Keith & Aminpour, Fatemeh & Dwyer, Zack, 2022. "Business models, consumer experiences and regulation of retirement villages," SocArXiv mb2vp, Center for Open Science.
    2. Beth Turnbull & Ann Taket & Melissa Graham, 2023. "Multilevel Continua of Mothers, Fathers and Childless Women and Men’s Work–Life “Choices” and Their Constraints, Enablers and Consequences," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-35, March.
    3. Qiqi Chen & Mengtong Chen & Camilla Kin Ming Lo & Ko Ling Chan & Patrick Ip, 2022. "Stress in Balancing Work and Family among Working Parents in Hong Kong," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-12, May.
    4. Mengni Chen & Stuart Gietel-Basten & Paul S. F. Yip, 2020. "Targeting and Mistargeting of Family Policies in High-Income Pacific Asian Societies: A Review of Financial Incentives," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(3), pages 389-413, June.
    5. Vera L. Buijs & Bertus F. Jeronimus & Gerine M. A. Lodder & Nardi Steverink & Peter Jonge, 2021. "Social Needs and Happiness: A Life Course Perspective," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1953-1978, April.
    6. Florianne C. J. Verkroost, 2022. "A Bayesian multivariate hierarchical growth curve model to examine cumulative socio‐economic (dis)advantage among childless adults and parents," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 185(4), pages 2234-2276, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:socinc:v:10:y:2022:i:3:p:149-159. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.