IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/poango/v10y2022i1p265-274.html

China’s Carbon Market: Potential for Success?

Author

Listed:
  • Gørild Heggelund

    (Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway)

  • Iselin Stensdal

    (Fridtjof Nansen Institute, Norway)

  • Maosheng Duan

    (Tsinghua University, China)

Abstract

What lessons emerged during the development of China’s national emissions trading scheme (ETS)? It was launched in late 2017 and started operation in July 2021, beginning with online trading of emissions permits. The preceding decade was used for preparing and testing, including seven pilot markets. It was decided to start with the power sector, the largest-emitting sector, and initially cover coal- and gas-fired power plants. This article offers theory-oriented and empirical contributions to domestic-level learning, and asks what happens after a policy has “landed.” We employ an analytical concept originating from diffusion theory— learning —and view internal learning as a key mechanism. We argue that having a slow and well-prepared start contributes to the potential success of the ETS; further, that the lengthy preparatory period enabled China to address various obstacles, providing a strong basis for success, singly and as part of the national mitigation policy complex. Internal learning has proven crucial to the development of the ETS in China, with the learning process continuing as the national ETS becomes operative. We also discuss the possibilities for linking China’s carbon market with other markets, which should heed China’s ETS experience and emphasize learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Gørild Heggelund & Iselin Stensdal & Maosheng Duan, 2022. "China’s Carbon Market: Potential for Success?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 265-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:1:p:265-274
    DOI: 10.17645/pag.v10i1.4792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/4792
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/pag.v10i1.4792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhe Deng & Dongya Li & Tao Pang & Maosheng Duan, 2018. "Effectiveness of pilot carbon emissions trading systems in China," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(8), pages 992-1011, September.
    2. Gørild Heggelund & Iselin Stensdal & Maosheng Duan & Jørgen Wettestad, 2019. "China’s Development of ETS as a GHG Mitigating Policy Tool: A Case of Policy Diffusion or Domestic Drivers?," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 36(2), pages 168-194, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Bing & GENG, Linna & W.Y. Tam, Vivian, 2025. "Effective carbon responsibility allocation in construction supply chain under the carbon trading policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 319(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gørild Heggelund & Iselin Stensdal & Maosheng Duan, 2022. "China’s Carbon Market: Potential for Success?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 265-274.
    2. Chunyan Dai & Michael G Pollitt, 2024. "From local carbon emissions pilots to the national carbon emissions trading scheme in China," Working Papers EPRG2417, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    3. Chen, Xing & Hou, Yu & He, Jiaxin & Shang, Hua, 2025. "Unified efficiency under market-based climate policy: A regression control analysis of China’s carbon trading scheme in the metallurgical sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    4. Chen, Hao & Gao, Xin-Ya & Liu, Jian-Yu & Zhang, Qian & Yu, Shiwei & Kang, Jia-Ning & Yan, Rui & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2020. "The grid parity analysis of onshore wind power in China: A system cost perspective," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 22-30.
    5. Chen, Xun-Qi & Ma, Chao-Qun & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Lei, Yu-Tian, 2023. "Carbon allowance auction design of China's ETS: A comprehensive hierarchical system based on blockchain," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1003-1019.
    6. Cenjie Liu & Chunbo Ma & Rui Xie, 2020. "Structural, Innovation and Efficiency Effects of Environmental Regulation: Evidence from China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Pilot," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(4), pages 741-768, April.
    7. Yu, Jian & Liu, Peng & Shi, Xunpeng & Ai, Xianneng, 2023. "China’s emissions trading scheme, firms’ R&D investment and emissions reduction," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 1021-1037.
    8. Wang, Wei & Zhang, Yue-Jun, 2022. "Does China's carbon emissions trading scheme affect the market power of high-carbon enterprises?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    9. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Zhao, Yongan & Chen, Dengsheng, 2025. "Emissions trading scheme's effect on enterprises' sustainable development in China: A differential game and a quasi-natural experiment," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    10. Fu, Yang & Zheng, Zeyu, 2020. "Volatility modeling and the asymmetric effect for China’s carbon trading pilot market," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 542(C).
    11. Wang, M. & Zhou, P., 2022. "A two-step auction-refund allocation rule of CO2 emission permits," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    12. Xiangnan Zhai & Xue Yang & Darko B. Vukovic & Daria A. Dinets & Qiang Liu, 2025. "Carbon Emissions Trading Policy and Regional Energy Efficiency: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Jon Birger Skjærseth & Steinar Andresen & Guri Bang & Gørild M. Heggelund, 2021. "The Paris agreement and key actors’ domestic climate policy mixes: comparative patterns," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 59-73, March.
    14. Fredrik Carlsson & Mitesh Kataria & Elina Lampi & Åsa Löfgren & Thomas Sterner, 2025. "The Importance of EU Coordination: Citizen Preferences for Climate Leadership and the Role of Conditional Cooperation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(5), pages 1339-1373, May.
    15. Li, Ge & Wang, Xiaoyu, 2024. "Energy quota trading policy and energy efficiency: The role of government supervision and public participation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    16. Fan, Wei & Li, Li & Wang, Feiran & Li, Ding, 2020. "Driving factors of CO2 emission inequality in China: The role of government expenditure," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Yu Zhang & Jie Wang & Jiakai Chen & Weizhong Liu, 2023. "Does environmental regulation policy help improve business performance of manufacturing enterprises? evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4335-4364, May.
    18. He, Ling-Yun & Chen, Kun-Xian, 2023. "Does China's regional emission trading scheme lead to carbon leakage? Evidence from conglomerates," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    19. Yuan, Xue & Dong, Yu & Liang, Liang & Wei, Yuting, 2025. "The impact of carbon emission trading scheme policy on information asymmetry in the stock market: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Qidi Wang & Jinyan Zhan & Hailin Zhang & Yuhan Cao & Zheng Yang & Quanlong Wu & Ali Raza Otho, 2025. "China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Market: Current Situation, Impact Assessment, Challenges, and Suggestions," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-27, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:poango:v10:y:2022:i:1:p:265-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.