IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v7y2019i1p193-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Journalism and Social Media: Redistribution of Power?

Author

Listed:
  • Marcel Broersma

    (Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

  • Scott A. Eldridge II

    (Centre for Media and Journalism Studies, University of Groningen, The Netherlands)

Abstract

This thematic issue sets out to explore the power relationships between journalism and social media. The articles here examine these relationships as intersections between journalistic actors and their audiences, and between news media, their content, and the functions of social media platforms. As the articles in this issue show, the emergence of social media and their adoption by news media and other social actors have brought about a series of changes which have had an impact on how news is produced, how information is shared, how audiences consume news, and how publics are formed. In this introduction, we highlight the work in this issue in order to reflect on the emergence of social media as one which has been accompanied by shifts in power in journalism and its ancillary fields, shifts which have in turn surfaced new questions for scholars to confront.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcel Broersma & Scott A. Eldridge II, 2019. "Journalism and Social Media: Redistribution of Power?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 193-197.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:193-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2048
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mats Ekström & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "The Dislocation of News Journalism: A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Epistemologies of Digital Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 259-270.
    2. Kelly Fincham, 2019. "Exploring Political Journalism Homophily on Twitter: A Comparative Analysis of US and UK Elections in 2016 and 2017," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 213-224.
    3. Chrysi Dagoula, 2019. "Mapping Political Discussions on Twitter: Where the Elites Remain Elites," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 225-234.
    4. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(3), pages 327-328, September.
    5. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(1), pages 1-2, March.
    6. Stephen Jukes, 2019. "Crossing the Line between News and the Business of News: Exploring Journalists’ Use of Twitter," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 248-258.
    7. Monika Djerf-Pierre & Mia Lindgren & Mikayla Alexis Budinski, 2019. "The Role of Journalism on YouTube: Audience Engagement with ‘Superbug’ Reporting," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 235-247.
    8. Scott A. Eldridge II & Lucía García-Carretero & Marcel Broersma, 2019. "Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 271-285.
    9. Axel Bruns & Christian Nuernbergk, 2019. "Political Journalists and Their Social Media Audiences: New Power Relations," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 198-212.
    10. Scott, John C., 2017. "From the Editor," Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(2), pages 141-143, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Mendez & Bella Palomo & Agustin Rivera, 2020. "Managing Social Networks in Online-Native Newsrooms: When Less Means More," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 124-134.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott A. Eldridge II & Lucía García-Carretero & Marcel Broersma, 2019. "Disintermediation in Social Networks: Conceptualizing Political Actors’ Construction of Publics on Twitter," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 271-285.
    2. Chloé Cherrier & Robert Courtois & Emmanuel Rusch & Catherine Potard, 2023. "Dysfunctional Attitudes, Sociotropy–Autonomy, and Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in Emerging Adulthood," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Xin Fang & Yun Cao, 2023. "Spatial Association Network Evolution and Variance Decomposition of Economic Sustainability Development Efficiency in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Ognjen Arandjelović, 2023. "A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Votes of People with Short Life Expectancy from Being a Long-Term Burden to Their Country," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-8, March.
    5. Jenelle Rouse & Amelia Palmer & Amy Parsons, 2023. "Reconstruct(ing) a Hidden History: Black Deaf Canadian Relat(ing) Identity," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    6. Muslikhin Muslikhin & Deddy Mulyana & Dadang Rahmat Hidayat & Prahastiwi Utari, 2021. "The Commodification, Spatialization and Structuration of Social Media in the Indonesian Cyber Media News," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 110-118.
    7. Salet, Xavier, 2021. "The search for the truest of authenticities: Online travel stories and their depiction of the authentic in the platform economy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Luca Serafini, 2023. "The old-new epistemology of digital journalism: how algorithms and filter bubbles are (re)creating modern metanarratives," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Peter Maurer & Christian Nuernbergk, 2022. "Editorial: Journalism, Activism, and Social Media: Exploring the Shifts in Journalistic Roles, Performance, and Interconnectedness," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 1-4.
    10. Johan Lindell & Joseph Ibrahim, 2021. "Something ‘Old’, Something ‘New’? The UK Space of Political Attitudes After the Brexit Referendum," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 26(3), pages 505-524, September.
    11. Andreu Casero-Ripollés & Josep-Lluís Micó-Sanz & Míriam Díez-Bosch, 2020. "Digital Public Sphere and Geography: The Influence of Physical Location on Twitter’s Political Conversation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 96-106.
    12. Oscar Westlund, 2021. "Advancing Research into Dark Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(1), pages 209-214.
    13. Andreu Casero-Ripollés, 2021. "Influencers in the Political Conversation on Twitter: Identifying Digital Authority with Big Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Unver, Hamid Akin & Ertan, Arhan S., 2022. "The Strategic Logic of Digital Disinformation Offense, Defence and Deterrence in Information Warfare," OSF Preprints pqj23, Center for Open Science.
    15. Dejan Jontes & Tanja Oblak Črnič & Breda Luthar, 2023. "Conceptualising Liveness and Visibility in the News Repertoires of Adolescents in a Polymedia Environment," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(4), pages 164-174.
    16. Valerie Belair-Gagnon & Avery E. Holton & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "Space for the Liminal," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 1-7.
    17. Antonio Mendez & Bella Palomo & Agustin Rivera, 2020. "Managing Social Networks in Online-Native Newsrooms: When Less Means More," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 124-134.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:7:y:2019:i:1:p:193-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.