IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v6y2018i4p91-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Networked News Participation: Future Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • Sue Robinson

    (School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA)

  • Yidong Wang

    (School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA)

Abstract

Civic participation in news production has been a trend under academic scrutiny for at least two decades. The prevalence of digital communication and the dominance of proprietary platforms are two combining forces that disrupt the established journalistic norms. In this article, we investigate news participation and make three grand statements regarding: 1) the holistic definition of participation, 2) the network structure of participation delineating the power dynamics of different media actors, and 3) the transnational context of participation exhibiting the structural constraints within nation-state sovereignty. It is our argument that news participation as a civic act in the digital, globalized age has not fundamentally democratized the information flow as early optimists predicted. Instead, a group of “information elite” have risen to power due to their access to institutional resources, their advantageous positioning in the media ecology, and their entrenchment in the dominant ideology. Participation on proprietary platforms can be easily co-opted to serve the interest of the new information elite.

Suggested Citation

  • Sue Robinson & Yidong Wang, 2018. "Networked News Participation: Future Pathways," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 91-102.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:91-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/1674
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. King, Gary & Pan, Jennifer & Roberts, Margaret E., 2017. "How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 111(3), pages 484-501, August.
    2. C. W. Anderson & Matthias Revers, 2018. "From Counter-Power to Counter-Pepe: The Vagaries of Participatory Epistemology in a Digital Age," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 24-25.
    3. Svenja Boberg & Tim Schatto-Eckrodt & Lena Frischlich & Thorsten Quandt, 2018. "The Moral Gatekeeper? Moderation and Deletion of User-Generated Content in a Leading News Forum," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 58-69.
    4. Kristoffer Holt, 2018. "Alternative Media and the Notion of Anti-Systemness: Towards an Analytical Framework," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 49-57.
    5. Juho Ruotsalainen & Mikko Villi, 2018. "Hybrid Engagement: Discourses and Scenarios of Entrepreneurial Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 79-90.
    6. Avery E. Holton & Valerie Belair-Gagnon, 2018. "Strangers to the Game? Interlopers, Intralopers, and Shifting News Production," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 70-78.
    7. Christian Fuchs, 2015. "Surveillance and Critical Theory," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(2), pages 6-9.
    8. Seth C. Lewis & Logan Molyneux, 2018. "A Decade of Research on Social Media and Journalism: Assumptions, Blind Spots, and a Way Forward," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 11-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oscar Westlund & Mats Ekström, 2018. "News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10.
    2. Nikki Usher & Matt Carlson, 2018. "The Midlife Crisis of the Network Society," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 107-110.
    3. Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, 2018. "Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 111-114.
    4. James E. Katz, 2018. "Commentary on News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 103-106.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James E. Katz, 2018. "Commentary on News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 103-106.
    2. Nikki Usher & Matt Carlson, 2018. "The Midlife Crisis of the Network Society," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 107-110.
    3. Oscar Westlund & Mats Ekström, 2018. "News and Participation through and beyond Proprietary Platforms in an Age of Social Media," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 1-10.
    4. Neta Kligler-Vilenchik, 2018. "Why We Should Keep Studying Good (and Everyday) Participation: An Analogy to Political Participation," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 111-114.
    5. Mats Ekström & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "The Dislocation of News Journalism: A Conceptual Framework for the Study of Epistemologies of Digital Journalism," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 259-270.
    6. Katherine M. Engelke, 2019. "Online Participatory Journalism: A Systematic Literature Review," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 31-44.
    7. Sherwin Chua & Oscar Westlund, 2019. "Audience-Centric Engagement, Collaboration Culture and Platform Counterbalancing: A Longitudinal Study of Ongoing Sensemaking of Emerging Technologies," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(1), pages 153-165.
    8. Li, Fei & Song, Yangbo & Zhao, Mofei, 2023. "Global manipulation by local obfuscation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Erin Baggott Carter & Brett L. Carter, 2021. "Propaganda and Protest in Autocracies," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 65(5), pages 919-949, May.
    10. Emilie Frenkiel & Anna Shpakovskaya, 2019. "The Evolution of Representative Claim-Making by the Chinese Communist Party: From Mao to Xi (1949–2019)," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 208-219.
    11. Ester Appelgren & Carl-Gustav Lindén, 2020. "Data Journalism as a Service: Digital Native Data Journalism Expertise and Product Development," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 62-72.
    12. Iacus Stefano M. & Salini Silvia & Siletti Elena & Porro Giuseppe, 2020. "Controlling for Selection Bias in Social Media Indicators through Official Statistics: a Proposal," Journal of Official Statistics, Sciendo, vol. 36(2), pages 315-338, June.
    13. Joshua Eisenman, 2018. "Commune Kabuki: Development and Productivity Growth under Maoist China's Rural Collectives," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(6), pages 1553-1579, November.
    14. Alfred Hermida & Mary Lynn Young, 2019. "From Peripheral to Integral? A Digital-Born Journalism Not for Profit in a Time of Crises," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 92-102.
    15. Virginia Small & James Warn, 2020. "Impacts on food policy from traditional and social media framing of moral outrage and cultural stereotypes," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(2), pages 295-309, June.
    16. Tatiana Santos Gonçalves & Pedro Jerónimo & João Carlos Correia, 2021. "Local News and Geolocation Technology in the Case of Portugal," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Avery E. Holton & Valerie Belair-Gagnon, 2018. "Strangers to the Game? Interlopers, Intralopers, and Shifting News Production," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 70-78.
    18. Kovic, Marko & Rauchfleisch, Adrian & Sele, Marc & Caspar, Christian, 2016. "Digital astroturfing in politics: Definition, typology, and countermeasures," SocArXiv 7ucsh, Center for Open Science.
    19. Sherwin Chua & Andrew Duffy, 2019. "Friend, Foe or Frenemy? Traditional Journalism Actors’ Changing Attitudes towards Peripheral Players and Their Innovations," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 112-122.
    20. Jessica Kunert, 2020. "Automation in Sports Reporting: Strategies of Data Providers, Software Providers, and Media Outlets," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 5-15.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v:6:y:2018:i:4:p:91-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.