IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cmj/seapas/y2019i21p249-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Societal Resilience And The Role Of Eu’S Actorness In The Eastern Neighbourhood

Author

Listed:
  • Anatolie CARBUNE

    (Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

Particularly since the European Union Global Strategy (EUGS) was published in 2016, the EU’s soft power projection in Eastern Neighbourhood revolves around the concept of resilience. EU is promoting the need for building resilience, considering that EaP states are facing many challenges associated with internal vulnerabilities and external threats, ranging from security risks to political uncertainty. However, the EUGS put a special emphasis on societal resilience, as many of states’ weaknesses are linked with internal systemic issues. The aim of this paper is to recount the origins of societal resilience at the core of EU’s narrative towards Eastern Neighbourhood, by focusing on the link between good governance and societal resilience. The concept of societal resilience is analysed in a wider manner; as it involves different dimensions, relevant empirical data is used to support the author’s arguments. With a stronger focus on societal resilience, EU could play a more salient role in exerting its transformative power. More than that, the limits of this approach as a policy goal for long term is discussed. As EU could play only an indirect role, societal resilience can be built only gradually and EaP partners have to actively support the EU in this process. In this context, the connection between good governance, economic development and societal resilience is crucial for long term stability.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatolie CARBUNE, 2019. "Societal Resilience And The Role Of Eu’S Actorness In The Eastern Neighbourhood," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 21, pages 249-254, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2019:i:21:p:249-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://seaopenresearch.eu/Journals/articles/SPAS_21_11.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Hill, 1993. "The Capability‐Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe's International Role," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 305-328, September.
    2. Cristian Nitoiu, 2018. "The European Union’s ‘Ideal Self’ in the Post-Soviet Space," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(5), pages 692-710, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    2. Meike Froitzheim & Fredrik Söderbaum & Ian Taylor, 2011. "The Limits of the EU as a Peace and Security Actor in the Democratic Republic of the Congo," Africa Spectrum, Institute of African Affairs, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 46(3), pages 45-70.
    3. Chris J. Bickerton & Bastien Irondelle & Anand Menon, 2011. "Security Co‐operation beyond the Nation‐State: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Christian B. Jensen & Jonathan Slapin & Thomas König, 2007. "Who Calls for a Common EU Foreign Policy?," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(3), pages 387-410, September.
    5. George ANGLIŢOIU, 2014. "The Eu Intelligence Service Dilemma," Europolity – Continuity and Change in European Governance - New Series, Department of International Relations and European Integration, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 8(2), pages 179-203.
    6. Anand Menon, 2011. "Power, Institutions and the CSDP: The Promise of Institutionalist Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 83-100, January.
    7. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    8. Scott Lavery & Davide Schmid, 2021. "European Integration and the New Global Disorder," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(5), pages 1322-1338, September.
    9. Chiara De Franco & Christoph O. Meyer & Karen E. Smith, 2015. "‘Living by Example?’ The European Union and the Implementation of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P)," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 994-1009, September.
    10. Helena Carrapico & André Barrinha, 2017. "The EU as a Coherent (Cyber)Security Actor?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1254-1272, November.
    11. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mai'a K. Davis Cross, 2017. "The EU's Power in the Russia–Ukraine Crisis: Enabled or Constrained?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 137-152, January.
    12. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Kaija Schilde, 2017. "European Military Capabilities: Enablers and Constraints on EU Power?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 37-53, January.
    13. Michael Smith, 2019. "The European Union and the Global Arena: In Search of Post-Brexit Roles," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 83-92.
    14. Erickson, Jennifer L., 2008. "Normative power and EU arms transfer policy: A theoretical critique and empirical test [Normative Macht und die EU-Waffenlieferungspolitik: Eine theoretische Kritik und ein empirischer Test]," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Global Governance SP IV 2008-301, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. James Rogers, 2009. "From ‘Civilian Power’ to ‘Global Power’: Explicating the European Union's ‘Grand Strategy’ Through the Articulation of Discourse Theory," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 831-862, September.
    16. Henrik Larsen, 2020. "Normative Power Europe or Capability–expectations Gap? The Performativity of Concepts in the Study of European Foreign Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 962-977, July.
    17. Loredana Maria SIMIONOV & Gabriela Carmen PASCARIU & Nadiia BUREIKO, 2021. "Building resilience beyond the EU’s eastern borders. EU actorness and societal perceptions in Ukraine and Republic of Moldova," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 12, pages 250-272, August.
    18. Guy Harpaz & Asaf Shamis, 2010. "Normative Power Europe and the State of Israel: An Illegitimate EUtopia?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(3), pages 579-616, June.
    19. Elsa Tulmets, 2007. "Can the Discourse on ÒSoft PowerÓ Help the EU to Bridge its Capability-Expectations Gap?," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 195-226.
    20. Ömer UÐUR, 2016. "The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 527-536, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eastern neighbourhood; Actorness; Good governance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F50 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cmj:seapas:y:2019:i:21:p:249-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serghie Dan (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://seaopenresearch.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.