IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cje/issued/v37y2004i1p189-198.html

An incremental analysis of the value of expanding a wilderness area

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Buttle
  • Daniel Rondeau

Abstract

Forsyth (2000) concludes from an option value analysis that when considered together, Killarney Provincial Park and two adjacent parcels of land should be preserved in an expanded park. With a simple discrete difference approach, we assess the incremental value of the adjacent land and decompose the benefits of park expansion. We identify a change in the value of the option to log the current park as a new component of value not previously reported. Applying the method to Killarney suggests that logging may be the most efficient use of the adjacent land. We also provide corrections for some of Forsyth's numerical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Buttle & Daniel Rondeau, 2004. "An incremental analysis of the value of expanding a wilderness area," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 37(1), pages 189-198, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:37:y:2004:i:1:p:189-198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3696105
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sims, Charles & Finnoff, David, 2013. "When is a “wait and see” approach to invasive species justified?," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 235-255.
    2. Charles Sims & David Finnoff, 2016. "Opposing Irreversibilities and Tipping Point Uncertainty," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 3(4), pages 985-1022.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cje:issued:v:37:y:2004:i:1:p:189-198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Werner Antweiler (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ceaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.