Alternative Nominal Anchors
In this paper, the choice of an intermediate target for monetary policy is considered using a model that allows each alternative to be judged based on its welfare effects, measured using a representative household's utility function. The results show that nominal income targeting is preferable to money supply targeting since it provides an appropriate response to money demand shocks. Price-level targeting dominates nominal income targeting, however, since it also provides an appropriate response to technology shocks. In fact, these results imply that price-level targeting represents the optimal monetary policy.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 31 (1998)
Issue (Month): 2 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Canadian Economics Association Prof. Steven Ambler, Secretary-Treasurer c/o Olivier Lebert, CEA/CJE/CPP Office C.P. 35006, 1221 Fleury Est Montréal, Québec, Canada H2C 3K4|
Web page: http://economics.ca/cje/
More information through EDIRC
|Order Information:|| Web: http://economics.ca/en/membership.php Email: |