IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cii/cepiie/2016-q3-147-5.html

Is the European banking system robust? An evaluation through the lens of the ECB?s Comprehensive Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Guillaume Arnould
  • Salim Dehmej

Abstract

The results of the Comprehensive Assessment conducted by the ECB seem to attest the soundness of the European banking system since only 8 of 130 assessed banks had to raise capital (€6bn) when results were released. However, non-failing banks are not completely healthy. If the Comprehensive Assessment has been a very complex exercise, it has flaws that lead to middling conclusion on the soundness of the Eurozone banking system. Relying on stress tests? literature and an international comparison, we show that the assumptions used for the Asset Quality Review and stress tests lead to weak capital requirements. Using public bank-level data provided by the ECB and the EBA, we address some critics and highlight substantial capital shortfalls due to the transitional arrangements, an implementation of Basel III sovereign debt requirements instead of the zero risk weights applied in Europe and a stressed leverage ratio as a complementary indicator of banks soundness. Finally, we show that the low profitability, the massive dividend distribution and the incurred fines, give rise to concern on the ability of Eurozone banks to meet the incoming capital requirements.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillaume Arnould & Salim Dehmej, 2016. "Is the European banking system robust? An evaluation through the lens of the ECB?s Comprehensive Assessment," International Economics, CEPII research center, issue 147, pages 126-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:cii:cepiie:2016-q3-147-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2110701716300105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepiie:2016-q3-147-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepiifr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.