IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v68y2015i01p07-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fracking: Should Controversial Natural Gas Production Methods Be Authorised?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Faulstich
  • Mechthild Baron
  • Walter Frenz
  • Hans-Joachim Kümpel
  • Matthias Knauff
  • Leon Leschus
  • Sven Schulze

Abstract

Should controversial fracking methods be authorised for commercial use in Germany? Martin Faulstich and Mechthild Baron, German Advisory Council on the Environment, come to the conclusion that fracking is not necessary from an energy policy point of view and can make no significant contribution to the energy turnaround. It should not be authorised commercially at the present time due to a serious knowledge gap about its implications. Walter Frenz, Rheinisch-Westfälischen Technischen Hochschule Aachen, notes that, from a legal viewpoint, a suitable proposal for an amendment of the law, and especially of the Water Resources Act, that would cover the opportunities and risks of fracking, already exists. Matthias Knauff, University of Jena, shows that the legislator is not entirely free to make decisions in this case. If existing environmental protection standards are to be respected, fracking is a constitutionally protected activity that cannot be prohibited for political reasons alone. However, the known and unknown risks that it entails could justify restrictions in line with the precautionary principle. In the opinion of Hans-Joachim Kümpel, German Federal Institute for Geo-Sciences and Raw Materials, fracking is a controllable technology, while Leon Leschus and Sven Schulze, Hamburgisches WeltWirtschaftsInstitut (HWWI), are sceptical about fracking for Germany on the whole.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Faulstich & Mechthild Baron & Walter Frenz & Hans-Joachim Kümpel & Matthias Knauff & Leon Leschus & Sven Schulze, 2015. "Fracking: Should Controversial Natural Gas Production Methods Be Authorised?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 68(01), pages 07-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:01:p:07-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2015_01_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q54 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Climate; Natural Disasters and their Management; Global Warming
    • L95 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Gas Utilities; Pipelines; Water Utilities

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:68:y:2015:i:01:p:07-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.