Author
Listed:
- Dirk Ehlers
- Otto Wiesheu
- Gerd Aberle
- Hans-Peter Friedrich
- Christian Kirchner
- Christoph Schaaffkamp
Abstract
Deutsche Bahn AG, a company currently owned by the federal government, is to be partly privatised. Most policy-makers agree on this point but not on how privatisation should be implemented. Dirk Ehlers, University of Münster, discusses the five privatisation variants that are under discussion and subjects them to a critical examination. He maintains that the strategy pursued by the legislators up to now - to privatise DB AG under retention of an integrated railway under common control - is not in accord with the German constitution because of the effects on the expansion and the maintenance of the track network - unless non-voting preference shares are issued and assurance can be given that voting rights do not re-emerge. For Otto Wiesheu, Deutsche Bahn AG, the railway reform "that was implemented in 1994 with a clear affirmation of competition and privatisation and in whose wake DB AG succeeded in the transition to a competitive and future-oriented enterprise with a good outlook for its employees is now being led to an absurd conclusion with a half-baked privatisation model à la Volksaktie. The diffuse picture that results when one examines the Volksaktie model more closely, leads one to conclude that its proponents are more interested in completely preventing a capital privatisation of DB AG." Gerd Aberle, University of Gießen, regards the economic results of the past years and the successful positioning of DB AG as an internationally active mobility service provider as a prerequisite for a successful IPO. For attracting new capital via an IPO especially institutional investors must be addressed who are seeking a secure longer-term capital investment with acceptable yields.
Suggested Citation
Dirk Ehlers & Otto Wiesheu & Gerd Aberle & Hans-Peter Friedrich & Christian Kirchner & Christoph Schaaffkamp, 2007.
"Railway Privatisation: Volksaktie (people's stock) or Normal IPO?,"
ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 60(22), pages 03-22, November.
Handle:
RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:60:y:2007:i:22:p:03-22
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
- G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
- G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:60:y:2007:i:22:p:03-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.