IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifosdt/v54y2001i03p17-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inhabitant weighting in the fiscal equalisation scheme - economic analysis and reform requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Christian Baretti
  • Bernd Huber
  • Karl Lichtblau
  • Rüdiger Parsche

Abstract

A controversial problem in Germany at the moment is the reform of the fiscal equalisation scheme necessitated by the decision of the constitutional court on 11 November 1999. A central aspect is the examination of the privileges enjoyed by the three city-states, Hamburg, Bremen and Berlin, under the current system. Possible extra requirements of the city states, in the opinion of the judges, must "be demonstrably appropriate on the basis of reliable and objective indicators". The study by the Ifo Institute, in collaboration with Prof. Bernd Huber, University of Munich, Dr. Karl Lichtblau, Institute of the German Economy in Cologne, and the Center for European Economic Research, concluded that the special situation of the city states must continue to be respected. However, the weighting given to the city states in the current fiscal equalisation scheme must be reduced, and a new, more differentiated system must be introduced. Likewise for sparsely populated Länder, no additional requirements can be claimed. An inhabitant weighting scheme is not necessary here.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian Baretti & Bernd Huber & Karl Lichtblau & Rüdiger Parsche, 2001. "Inhabitant weighting in the fiscal equalisation scheme - economic analysis and reform requirements," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 54(03), pages 17-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:54:y:2001:i:03:p:17-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifosd_2001_3_2.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • H72 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
    • R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:54:y:2001:i:03:p:17-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.