IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Innovation in Deutschland : Ergebnisse des ifo Innovationstests nach der neuen Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige

Listed author(s):
  • Heinz Schmalholz
  • Horst Penzkofer


Nach den Ergebnissen des ifo Innovationstests haben in den Jahren 1996 bis 1998 jeweils rund drei Viertel der deutschen Industrieunternehmen ihr Produktionsprogramm oder ihre Produktionsanlagen modernisiert. Auch für innovative Unternehmen dürfte der Spielraum für Umsatzsteigerungen enger werden. Jedenfalls schätzten die Industrieunternehmen Ende 1998 ihre mittelfristigen Absatzchancen etwas schlechter ein als ein Jahr zuvor. Da Innovationen eine notwendige, aber nicht hinreichende Bedingung für wirtschaftlichen Erfolg sind, wurden die Unternehmen auch gefragt, welche Ziele sie mit den 1991 bis 1996 durchgeführten Innovationen verfolgt hatten und zusätzlich, ob sie die Ziele tatsächlich erreicht haben.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Article provided by ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich in its journal ifo Schnelldienst.

Volume (Year): 52 (1999)
Issue (Month): 05 (October)
Pages: 03-11

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:52:y:1999:i:05:p:03-11
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 München

Phone: +49-89-9224-0
Fax: +49-89-985369
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:52:y:1999:i:05:p:03-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.