IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Wohneigentumsförderung könnte effizienter sein : Ergebnisse einer Evaluierung alternativer Instrumente

Listed author(s):
  • Karin Behring
  • Georg Goldrian
Registered author(s):

    Im ifo-Institut wurde im Februar 1991 ein Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesverbandes deutscher Banken abgeschlossen, das u.a. erstmalig in Deutschland eine quantifizierte Effizienzanalyse wohnungspolitischer Maßnahmen der Eigentumsförderung enthält. Die Diskussion der Eigentumsförderung, sowohl was ihre Kosten für den Staat, als auch was ihre Wirksamkeit betrifft, mußte bislang mit plausiblen Argumenten und fiktiven Überschlagsrechnungen vorliebnehmen. Denn die Komplexität der Wohnungsmärkte erlaubt es nicht, ohne die Verwendung eines realitätsnahen modellhaften Abbildes des tatsächlichen Nachfrageverhaltens die Effizienz eines wohnungspolitischen Instruments zu berechnen. Zur Bestimmung der in Relation zu den Kosten unterschiedlichen Wirksamkeit ausgewählter Maßnahmen wurde das ifo-Wohnungsnachfragemodell eingesetzt.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich in its journal ifo Schnelldienst.

    Volume (Year): 44 (1991)
    Issue (Month): 19 (October)
    Pages: 16-26

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:44:y:1991:i:19:p:16-26
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 München

    Phone: +49-89-9224-0
    Fax: +49-89-985369
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifosdt:v:44:y:1991:i:19:p:16-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Klaus Wohlrabe)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.