IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/ifodre/v25y2018i04p34-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kreise gewachsen – Bilanz durchwachsen: Zehn Jahre Kreisgebietsreform in Sachsen undSachsen-Anhalt

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian Blesse
  • Felix Rösel

Abstract

Am 1. August 2008 fusionierten 29 sächsische Landkreise und kreisfreie Städte zu 13 neuen Verwaltungen. Gut ein Jahr zuvor reformierte das Nachbarland Sachsen-Anhalt seine Kreisstruktur. Zu den Geburtstagen will vielerorts allerdings nur wenig Feierlaune aufkommen. Auch gut ein Jahrzehnt nach der Reform ist in den neuen Großkreisen kaum eine gemeinsame Identität entstanden, das Interesse der Bürger an der Kreispolitik ist rückläufig. Außerdem sind die erhofften Einspareffekte sowohl in Sachsen als auch in Sachsen-Anhalt zumindest bisher ausgeblieben.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian Blesse & Felix Rösel, 2018. "Kreise gewachsen – Bilanz durchwachsen: Zehn Jahre Kreisgebietsreform in Sachsen undSachsen-Anhalt," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 25(04), pages 34-36, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:25:y:2018:i:04:p:34-36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/ifoDD_18-04_34-36_Blesse.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sebastian Blesse & Felix Roesel, 2019. "Merging county administrations – cross-national evidence of fiscal and political effects," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 611-631, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mona Förtsch & Felix Rösel, 2020. "Territorial Reforms Reduce Sense of Local Identity," ifo Dresden berichtet, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 27(01), pages 03-05, February.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • H70 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - General
    • R53 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Public Facility Location Analysis; Public Investment and Capital Stock
    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:ifodre:v:25:y:2018:i:04:p:34-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifooode.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.