IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/epofor/v26y2025i03p35-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Securing Peace in Europe: A Role for the Weimar Triangle?

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Lohse
  • Armin Bolouri

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Lohse & Armin Bolouri, 2025. "Securing Peace in Europe: A Role for the Weimar Triangle?," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(03), pages 35-40, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:26:y:2025:i:03:p:35-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/econpol-forum-3-2025-lohse-defense-sovereignty.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lohse Tim & Börger Tobias & Meyerhoff Jürgen & Qari Salmai, 2025. "Steigerung der Verteidigungsfähigkeit Deutschlands: Optionen, Finanzierung und Effizienzsteigerung," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 105(4), pages 226-230.
    2. Florian Dorn & Niklas Potrafke & Marcel Schlepper, 2024. "European Defence Spending in 2024 and Beyond: How to Provide Security in an Economically Challenging Environment," EconPol Policy Reports 45, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    3. Qari, Salmai & Börger, Tobias & Lohse, Tim & Meyerhoff, Jürgen, 2024. "The value of national defense: Assessing public preferences for defense policy options," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    4. Lohse Tim & Börger Tobias & Meyerhoff Jürgen & Qari Salmai, 2023. "Der Wert von Sicherheit und nationaler Verteidigung," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 103(6), pages 394-399, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lohse Tim & Börger Tobias & Meyerhoff Jürgen & Qari Salmai, 2025. "Steigerung der Verteidigungsfähigkeit Deutschlands: Optionen, Finanzierung und Effizienzsteigerung," Wirtschaftsdienst, Sciendo, vol. 105(4), pages 226-230.
    2. Niklas Potrafke & Emil Scholten & Tuuli Tähtinen & Konstantinos Theocharopoulos, 2025. "German Public Opinion on Defense and the Bundeswehr," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 26(03), pages 10-16, July.
    3. Armin A. Bolouri & Tim Lohse & Salmai Qari, 2025. "Interdependent Preferences for Financing and Providing Public Goods—The Case of National Defense," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(3), pages 807-821, August.
    4. Qari, Salmai & Börger, Tobias & Lohse, Tim & Meyerhoff, Jürgen, 2024. "The value of national defense: Assessing public preferences for defense policy options," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Sergio Mariotti, 2025. "“Open strategic autonomy” as an industrial policy compass for the EU competitiveness and growth: The good, the bad, or the ugly?," Economia e Politica Industriale: Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, Springer;Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale, vol. 52(1), pages 1-26, March.
    6. Dmitry Alexandrovich REPNIKOV, 2024. "Defense Expenditures and GDP Growth Rates in the World: Determinants and Interrelationships," Russian Foreign Economic Journal, Russian Foreign Trade Academy Ministry of economic development of the Russian Federation, issue 5, pages 48-58, May.
    7. Joop Age Harm Adema & Panu Poutvaara & Marcel Schlepper & Tuncay Taghiyev & Timo Wochner, 2024. "Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten einer Wiedereinführung der Wehrpflicht oder eines sozialen Pflichtjahres," ifo Forschungsberichte, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, number 144.
    8. M. P. Afanasyev & N. N. Shash, 2025. "Recovery Budget: Objectives and Contents (Based on the French State Budget for 2025)," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 753-764, October.
    9. Wolff, Guntram B. & Burilkov, Alexandr & Bushnell, Katelyn & Kharitonov Ivan, 2024. "Fit for war in decades: Europe's and Germany's slow rearmament vis-à-vis Russia," Kiel Report 1, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:epofor:v:26:y:2025:i:03:p:35-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.