IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ces/eeagre/vy2018ip64-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chapter 4: It’s OK to Be Different: Policy Coordination and Economic Convergence

Author

Listed:
  • Torben M. Andersen
  • Giuseppe Bertola
  • John Driffill
  • Clemens Fuest
  • Harold James
  • Jan-Egbert Sturm
  • Branko Uroševic

Abstract

In the debate over the economic and political development of the European Union, the perception of growing economic divergence plays a key role. Economic convergence is a declared political objective of the Union. Article 174 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union states that “The Union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions” (European Union, 2012). There is a widespread view that economic convergence among the EU member states progressed until 2008, but that divergence seems to have prevailed since the outbreak of the global financial crisis and the eurozone debt crisis. At the same time, economic disparity and inequality within member states is a hotly debated topic. In fact, some aspects of convergence were not occurring even before the global financial crisis, as will be shown in this chapter.

Suggested Citation

  • Torben M. Andersen & Giuseppe Bertola & John Driffill & Clemens Fuest & Harold James & Jan-Egbert Sturm & Branko Uroševic, 2018. "Chapter 4: It’s OK to Be Different: Policy Coordination and Economic Convergence," EEAG Report on the European Economy, CESifo, vol. 0, pages 64-82, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:ces:eeagre:v::y:2018:i::p:64-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cesifo.org/DocDL/eeag-2018-its-ok-to-be-different-policy-coordination-and-economic-convergence.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Martin Braml & Gabriel Felbermayr, 2018. "Regional Inequality in Germany and the EU: What Do the Data Say?," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 71(07), pages 37-49, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ces:eeagre:v::y:2018:i::p:64-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klaus Wohlrabe (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cesifde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.