IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cdh/commen/460.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two Sets of Books at City Hall? Grading the Financial Reports of Canada’s Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Dachis

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

  • William Robson

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

  • Jennifer Tsao

    (C.D. Howe Institute)

Abstract

In nearly all Canada’s larger cities, obscure financial reports – notably inconsistent presentations of key numbers in budgets and end-of-year financial reports – hamper legislators, ratepayers and voters seeking to hold their municipal governments to account. Simple questions like “How much does your municipal government plan to spend this year?” or “How much did it spend last year?” are hard or impossible for a non-expert citizen or councilor to answer. By presenting net rather than gross figures in their budgets, most cities understate their revenue and spending and obscure key activities. The differences in accounting methods in most cities’ budgets as compared to the presentations of their financial results are large, and have real-world consequences. By using cash rather than accrual accounting, cities exaggerate the costs of investments in infrastructure, hide the cost of pension obligations, and make it hard to match the costs and benefits of municipal activities to taxpayers and citizens. Moreover, many cities present their budgets late, after significant money has already been committed or spent, do not publish their financial results in a timely way, and bury key numbers deep in their reports. This report grades the financial presentations of major cities in Canada in their most recent budgets and financial reports. Toronto and Winnipeg are at the bottom, with Fs. In addition to approving their budgets many weeks after their fiscal years had started, these cities provide little information in reader-friendly form. More happily, the cities of Brampton, Calgary, Halifax, Halton and Vancouver garner higher marks. Our key recommendations are that municipal governments should present their annual budgets on the same accounting basis as their financial statements, and that budgets should show gross, not net, revenue and spending figures. Budgets should use accrual accounting, recording revenues and expenses as the relevant activities occur over time. Provincial governments exercise decisive control over cities, so those that impede accrual-based budgets at the municipal level should stop doing so. Now is an opportune time for this change: major reviews of the acts governing municipalities are nearly complete in Alberta and Ontario. Even in cases where a province is the impediment, cities can release the relevant information on their own – and they should.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Dachis & William Robson & Jennifer Tsao, 2016. "Two Sets of Books at City Hall? Grading the Financial Reports of Canada’s Cities," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 460, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:460
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cdhowe.org/sites/default/files/attachments/research_papers/mixed/Commentary%20460.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bev Dahlby & Michael Smart, 2015. "The Structure and Presentation of Provincial Budgets," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 8(25), May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. William B.P. Robson & Benjamin Dachis & Farah Omran, 2017. "Fuzzy Finances: Grading the Financial Reports of Canada’s Municipalities," C.D. Howe Institute Commentary, C.D. Howe Institute, issue 496, November.
    2. Bev Dahlby & Kevin Milligan, 2017. "From theory to practice: Canadian economists’ contributions to public finance," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(5), pages 1324-1347, December.
    3. Benjamin Dachis, 2018. "Hosing Homebuyers: Why Cities Should Not Pay for Water and Wastewater Infrastructure with Development Charges," e-briefs 281, C.D. Howe Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Almos T. Tassonyi, 2017. "The Context and Challenges for Canada's Mid-Sized Cities," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 10(9), May.
    2. Melville McMillan, 2019. "Provincial Public Infrastructure Spending and Financing in Alberta: Searching for a Better Course," SPP Research Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 12(10), March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Governance and Accountability;

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
    • H5 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cdh:commen:460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kristine Gray (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cdhowca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.